These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A guide to evaluating epidemiological studies. Pallasch TJ J N J Dent Assoc; 2000; 71(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 11324066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations. Ioannidis JP Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research. Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An integrated approach to the meta-analysis of genetic association studies using Mendelian randomization. Minelli C; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Abrams KR Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 15321841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical statistics for primary care practitioners: part I--incidence, prevalence, and the odds ratio. McHugh ML J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2007 Jan; 12(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 17233669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of sero-epidemiologic studies of the relation between Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: does study design influence results? Bloemenkamp DG; Mali WP; Visseren FL; van der Graaf Y Am Heart J; 2003 Mar; 145(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 12660662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Bradburn MJ; Deeks JJ; Berlin JA; Russell Localio A Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 16596572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Green tea and gastric cancer risk: meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Zhou Y; Li N; Zhuang W; Liu G; Wu T; Yao X; Du L; Wei M; Wu X Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 18364341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes. Tian L Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18383448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishment of genetic associations for complex diseases is independent of early study findings. Trikalinos TA; Ntzani EE; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Ioannidis JP Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Sep; 12(9):762-9. PubMed ID: 15213707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting epidemiologic research: lessons from studies of childhood cancer. Linet MS; Wacholder S; Zahm SH Pediatrics; 2003 Jul; 112(1 Pt 2):218-32. PubMed ID: 12837914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alcohol, coffee, and bladder cancer risk: a review of epidemiological studies. Pelucchi C; La Vecchia C Eur J Cancer Prev; 2009 Feb; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19077567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Epidemiological study of low risk factors]. Matanoski G Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Dec; 18(6):353-5. PubMed ID: 9812540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses. Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]