210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11327411)
1. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible?
Gašpar D; Crnković T; Durović D; Podsednik D; Slišurić F
Med Glas (Zenica); 2012 Aug; 9(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 22926358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simplified classification of proximal femoral fractures improves accuracy, confidence, and inter-reader agreement of hip fracture classification by radiology residents.
Mandell JC; Wrobel WC; Laur O; Shah N; Robinson-Weiss C; Weaver MJ; Khurana B
Emerg Radiol; 2019 Apr; 26(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 30471006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures.
Iguchi M; Takahashi T; Matsumura T; Ae R; Hiyama S; Nakashima M; Takeshita K
Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3363-3368. PubMed ID: 34598792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
Martin JS; Marsh JL; Bonar SK; DeCoster TA; Found EM; Brandser EA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 9334948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gunshot femoral shaft fractures: is the current classification system reliable?
Shepherd LE; Zalavras CG; Jaki K; Shean C; Patzakis MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Mar; (408):101-9. PubMed ID: 12616045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evans' classification of trochanteric fractures: an assessment of the interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Andersen E; Jørgensen LG; Hededam LT
Injury; 1990 Nov; 21(6):377-8. PubMed ID: 2276801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Dai LY; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Jiang LS; Lu H
Injury; 2005 Jul; 36(7):858-61. PubMed ID: 15949488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of binary decision making on the classification of fractures of the ankle.
Craig WL; Dirschl DR
J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 9619464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Huang JF; Chen JJ; Shen JJ; Du WX; Liu FC; Tong PJ
Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Aug; 82(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 27682284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.
Guyver PM; McCarthy MJ; Jain NP; Poulter RJ; McAllen CJ; Keenan J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 May; 24(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 23412146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor reproducibility of Evans' classification of the trochanteric fracture. Assessment of 4 observers in 52 cases.
Gehrchen PM; Nielsen JO; Olesen B
Acta Orthop Scand; 1993 Feb; 64(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 8451952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
Naqvi GA; Baig SA; Awan N
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1047-50. PubMed ID: 22425302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
