These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11327791)

  • 1. The effect of posteroanterior mobilisation on sagittal mobility of the lumbar spine.
    Petty NJ
    Man Ther; 1995 Nov; 1(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11327791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of surface electromyographic activity of erector spinae before and after the application of central posteroanterior mobilisation on the lumbar spine.
    Krekoukias G; Petty NJ; Cheek L
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Feb; 19(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 17888680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of position on the posteroanterior stiffness of the lumbar spine.
    Edmondston SJ; Allison GT; Gregg CD; Purden SM; Svansson GR; Watson AE
    Man Ther; 1998 Feb; 3(1):21-26. PubMed ID: 11487297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):567-78. PubMed ID: 14673406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
    Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and reliability of measures obtained from the OSI CA-6000 Spine Motion Analyzer for lumbar spinal motion.
    Schuit D; Petersen C; Johnson R; Levine P; Knecht H; Goldberg D
    Man Ther; 1997 Nov; 2(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 11440534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of direction of applied mobilization force on the posteroanterior response in the lumbar spine.
    Caling B; Lee M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Feb; 24(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11208218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Fuhr AW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Oct; 23(8):521-30. PubMed ID: 11050608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain.
    Colloca CJ; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):489-500. PubMed ID: 11677547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    Physiotherapy; 2010 Jun; 96(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 20420958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal plane rotation of the pelvis during lumbar posteroanterior loading.
    Lee M; Lau H; Lau T
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 8006529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
    Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Active trunk extensor contributions to dynamic posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness.
    Colloca CJ; Keller TS
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 May; 27(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15148461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.
    Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Harrison DE; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16378668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of loading frequency on response of the spine to lumbar posteroanterior forces.
    Lee M; Svensson NL
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1993 Sep; 16(7):439-46. PubMed ID: 8228646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
    Drake JD; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 18234402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
    Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation into the potential hypoalgesic effects of different amplitudes of PA mobilisations on the lumbar spine as measured by pressure pain thresholds (PPT).
    Krouwel O; Hebron C; Willett E
    Man Ther; 2010 Feb; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19643656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Force-deformation response of the lumbar spine: a sagittal plane model of posteroanterior manipulation and mobilization.
    Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Béliveau JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Mar; 17(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 11937256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.