These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11327793)

  • 1. Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender.
    Hole DE; Cook JM; Bolton JE
    Man Ther; 1995 Nov; 1(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11327793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility.
    Breum J; Wiberg J; Bolton JE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 8583171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects.
    Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B
    Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
    Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
    Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
    Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement and reliability of two non-invasive methods for assessing cervical range of motion among young adults.
    Florêncio LL; Pereira PA; Silva ER; Pegoretti KS; Gonçalves MC; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
    Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20464161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device.
    Capuano-Pucci D; Rheault W; Aukai J; Bracke M; Day R; Pastrick M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1991 Apr; 72(5):338-40. PubMed ID: 2009054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interexaminer reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion.
    Zachman ZJ; Traina AD; Keating JC; Bolles ST; Braun-Porter L
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Jun; 12(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 2746145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
    Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults.
    Tousignant M; Smeesters C; Breton AM; Breton E; Corriveau H
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Apr; 36(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 16676874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device.
    Rheault W; Albright B; Beyers C; Franta M; Johnson A; Skowronek M; Dougherty J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1992; 15(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of inclinometer and goniometric measurements of hip extension flexibility using the modified Thomas test.
    Clapis PA; Davis SM; Davis RO
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2008; 24(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18432516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of a Coda Motion 3-D Analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in healthy subjects.
    Song H; Zhai X; Gao Z; Lu T; Tian Q; Li H; He X
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Feb; 38():56-66. PubMed ID: 29169054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
    Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical mobility in women with migraine.
    Bevilaqua-Grossi D; Pegoretti KS; Goncalves MC; Speciali JG; Bordini CA; Bigal ME
    Headache; 2009 May; 49(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 18783446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
    Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Active lateral neck flexion range of motion measurements obtained with a modified goniometer: reliability and estimates of normal.
    Pellecchia GL; Bohannon RW
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 9777543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
    Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system.
    Assink N; Bergman GJ; Knoester B; Winters JC; Dijkstra PU; Postema K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 16096040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.