These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11329690)

  • 1. Allele-sharing among affected relatives: non-parametric methods for identifying genes.
    Shih MC; Whittemore AS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Feb; 10(1):27-55. PubMed ID: 11329690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal allele-sharing statistics for genetic mapping using affected relatives.
    McPeek MS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):225-49. PubMed ID: 10096687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):118-27. PubMed ID: 8086596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tests for covariate-associated heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing of affected relatives.
    Mirea L; Briollais L; Bull S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 14691956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allele-sharing statistics using information on family history.
    Callegaro A; Meulenbelt I; Kloppenburg M; Slagboom PE; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Nov; 74(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 20707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transmission-ratio distortion and allele sharing in affected sib pairs: a new linkage statistic with reduced bias, with application to chromosome 6q25.3.
    Lemire M; Roslin NM; Laprise C; Hudson TJ; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):571-86. PubMed ID: 15322985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inherent bias toward the null hypothesis in conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis.
    Schork NJ; Greenwood TA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Feb; 74(2):306-16. PubMed ID: 14732904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing among covariate-defined subgroups: issues and findings for affected relatives.
    Bull SB; Mirea L; Briollais L; Logan AG
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):94-106. PubMed ID: 14614243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of allele-sharing statistics for general pedigrees.
    Feingold E; Song KK; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 11055376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Type I error rates in association versus joint linkage/association tests in related individuals.
    Kent JW; Dyer TD; Göring HH; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 17219375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suggestive evidence for a schizophrenia susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q and a confirmation in an independent series of pedigrees.
    Cao Q; Martinez M; Zhang J; Sanders AR; Badner JA; Cravchik A; Markey CJ; Beshah E; Guroff JJ; Maxwell ME; Kazuba DM; Whiten R; Goldin LR; Gershon ES; Gejman PV
    Genomics; 1997 Jul; 43(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9226366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The elusive goal of pedigree weights.
    Sengul H; Bhattacharjee S; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 31(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 17086515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiparametric linkage analysis using pseudolikelihoods on neighbouring sets.
    Li H; Huang J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):323-36. PubMed ID: 9924610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complex traits on the map.
    Ott J; Lucek P
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1998; 154():285-91. PubMed ID: 10027008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kinship testing with X-chromosomal markers: mathematical and statistical issues.
    Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19083739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the relative information in allele-sharing linkage studies.
    Nicolae DL; Kong A
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):368-75. PubMed ID: 15180662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.
    Weeks DE; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Feb; 42(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 3422543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Powerful allele sharing statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.
    Lange EM; Lange K
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 15133312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.