245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11331959)
1. Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading.
Bova GS; Parmigiani G; Epstein JI; Wheeler T; Mucci NR; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 11331959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.
Helin H; Lundin M; Lundin J; Martikainen P; Tammela T; Helin H; van der Kwast T; Isola J
Hum Pathol; 2005 Apr; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15891999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Bastacky SI; Burks RT; Cina SJ; Mills SE; Ross JS; Sakr WA; Tomaszewski JE; True LD; Ulbright TM; Weinstein MW; Yantiss RK; Young RH; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2000 Sep; 31(9):1044-50. PubMed ID: 11014569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Creation of a digital slide and tissue microarray resource from a multi-institutional predictive toxicology study in the rat: an initial report from the PredTox group.
Mulrane L; Rexhepaj E; Smart V; Callanan JJ; Orhan D; Eldem T; Mally A; Schroeder S; Meyer K; Wendt M; O'Shea D; Gallagher WM
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Aug; 60(4-5):235-45. PubMed ID: 18479893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate.
Jafari-Khouzani K; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 12814236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images.
Tabesh A; Teverovskiy M; Pang HY; Kumar VP; Verbel D; Kotsianti A; Saidi O
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1366-78. PubMed ID: 17948727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microarray image spot segmentation using the method of projections.
Stanley RJ; Gattapulli M; Caldwell CW
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():387-92. PubMed ID: 12085637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RealSpot: software validating results from DNA microarray data analysis with spot images.
Chen Z; Liu L
Physiol Genomics; 2005 Apr; 21(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 15687483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue microarrays: applications in genomic research.
Watanabe A; Cornelison R; Hostetter G
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Mar; 5(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 15833047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gene expression profiles in prostate cancer: association with patient subgroups and tumour differentiation.
Halvorsen OJ; Oyan AM; Bø TH; Olsen S; Rostad K; Haukaas SA; Bakke AM; Marzolf B; Dimitrov K; Stordrange L; Lin B; Jonassen I; Hood L; Akslen LA; Kalland KH
Int J Oncol; 2005 Feb; 26(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 15645116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TmaDB: a repository for tissue microarray data.
Sharma-Oates A; Quirke P; Westhead DR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 6():218. PubMed ID: 16137321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National Oncology Forum: perspectives for the year 2000.
DeVita VT; Bleickardt EW
Cancer J; 2001; 7 Suppl 1():S2-13. PubMed ID: 11504281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do we truly see what we think we see? The role of cognitive bias in pathological interpretation.
Fandel TM; Pfnür M; Schäfer SC; Bacchetti P; Mast FW; Corinth C; Ansorge M; Melchior SW; Thüroff JW; Kirkpatrick CJ; Lehr HA
J Pathol; 2008 Oct; 216(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18683853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving gene quantification by adjustable spot-image restoration.
Daskalakis A; Cavouras D; Bougioukos P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Kagadis GC; Argyropoulos C; Nikiforidis G
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2265-72. PubMed ID: 17599935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
