These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11332553)

  • 1. Estimation of error and bias in Bayesian Monte Carlo decision analysis using the bootstrap.
    Linville CD; Hobbs BF; Venkatesh BN
    Risk Anal; 2001 Feb; 21(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 11332553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.
    Austin PC; Small DS
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4306-19. PubMed ID: 25087884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation-based estimation for the minimum mortality temperature in temperature-mortality association study.
    Lee W; Kim H; Hwang S; Zanobetti A; Schwartz JD; Chung Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28882102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations between parameters in risk models: estimation and propagation of uncertainty by Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
    Ades AE; Lu G
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 14641891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Nordtest method and bootstrap resampling for measurement uncertainty estimation of hematology analytes in a medical laboratory.
    Cui M; Xu L; Wang H; Ju S; Xu S; Jing R
    Clin Biochem; 2017 Dec; 50(18):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 28928006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient Monte Carlo evaluation of resampling-based hypothesis tests with applications to genetic epidemiology.
    Fung WK; Yu K; Yang Y; Zhou JY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1437-1450. PubMed ID: 27507290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating sampling error of evolutionary statistics based on genetic covariance matrices using maximum likelihood.
    Houle D; Meyer K
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Aug; 28(8):1542-9. PubMed ID: 26079756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian
    Richard MD; Lippmann RP
    Neural Comput; 1991; 3(4):461-483. PubMed ID: 31167331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculating Power by Bootstrap, with an Application to Cluster-Randomized Trials.
    Kleinman K; Huang SS
    EGEMS (Wash DC); 2016; 4(1):1202. PubMed ID: 28303254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning ensemble with asymptotic techniques for oscillometric blood pressure estimation.
    Lee S; Chang JH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Nov; 151():1-13. PubMed ID: 28946991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi SA
    J Health Econ; 2007 Jan; 26(1):122-48. PubMed ID: 16945438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimation of uncertainties of DTI parameters.
    Chung S; Lu Y; Henry RG
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 16938472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bootstrap Resampling of Temporal Dominance of Sensations Curves to Compute Uncertainties.
    Okamoto S
    Foods; 2021 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 34681521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing performance of prediction rules in machine learning.
    Martin R; Yu K
    Pharmacogenomics; 2006 Jun; 7(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 16753002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model-based bootstrapping when correcting for measurement error with application to logistic regression.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Romeo G; Thoresen M
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 28556914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.