420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11333061)
1. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.
Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S
Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Koster RW; Dorian P; Chapman FW; Schmitt PW; O'Grady SG; Walker RG
Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):e20. PubMed ID: 15131555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
Gurevitz OT; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Chandrasekaran K; Rosales AG; Ballman KV; Hammill SC; White RD; Gersh BJ; Friedman PA
Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 15846271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation.
Rho RW; Page RL
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Sep; 7(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 14739730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ambulatory electrocardioversion of atrial fibrillation by means of biphasic versus monophasic shock delivery. A prospective randomized study].
Neumann T; Erdogan A; Reiner C; Siemon G; Kurzidim K; Berkowitsch A; Kuniss M; Sperzel J; Hamm CW; Pitschner HF
Z Kardiol; 2004 May; 93(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 15160273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a biphasic, truncated exponential shock waveform at variable initial shock energies.
Rashba EJ; Gold MR; Crawford FA; Leman RB; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(12):1572-4. PubMed ID: 15589022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].
Carunchio A; Burattini M; Coletta C; Pandolfo L; Porzio A; Zecchini F; Ceci V
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jun; 3(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12116814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks.
Mittal S; Ayati S; Stein KM; Schwartzman D; Cavlovich D; Tchou PJ; Markowitz SM; Slotwiner DJ; Scheiner MA; Lerman BB
Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1282-7. PubMed ID: 10725288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biphasic shock waveform for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency room].
Antonelli D; Feldman A; Freedberg NA; Darawsha A; Rosenfeld T
Harefuah; 2005 Jan; 144(1):4-7, 72. PubMed ID: 15719812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Serum troponin I and myoglobin after monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic shocks for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Kosior DA; Opolski G; Tadeusiak W; Chwyczko T; Wozakowska-Kaplon B; Stawicki S; Filipak KJ; Rabczenko D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S128-32. PubMed ID: 15683479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy.
Kawabata VS; Vianna CB; Moretti MA; Gonzalez MM; Ferreira JF; Timerman S; Cesar LA
Europace; 2007 Feb; 9(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 17272337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficacy and safety of ambulatory electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shock].
Neri G; Alitto F; Zamprogno R; Biondi P; Stefanini MG; Pizzolato F; Buchberger R
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Dec; 2(12):1315-8. PubMed ID: 11838354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impact of electrical shock waveform and paddle positions on efficacy of direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation].
Stanaitiene G; Babarskiene RM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(9):665-72. PubMed ID: 18971603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Niebauer MJ; Brewer JE; Chung MK; Tchou PJ
Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 93(12):1495-9. PubMed ID: 15194019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Scholten M; Szili-Torok T; Klootwijk P; Jordaens L
Heart; 2003 Sep; 89(9):1032-4. PubMed ID: 12923020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
