These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11336379)

  • 1. A conceptual framework for the study of the quality of rehabilitation.
    Müller D
    Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):209. PubMed ID: 11336379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care.
    Eldar R
    Disabil Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 22(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 10798304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of care in rehabilitation medicine.
    Eldar R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Feb; 11(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 10411292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary on 'A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care.'.
    Gladman JR
    Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):215-6; discussion 219-20. PubMed ID: 11336382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commentary on: a conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care.
    Ansari SA; Al Deeb SM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):210-2; discussion 219-20. PubMed ID: 11336380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on 'A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care'.
    Klazinga N
    Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):217-8; discussion 219-20. PubMed ID: 11336383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary on the paper: 'A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care' by Dr Ruben Eldar.
    Massoud MR
    Disabil Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 23(5):213-4; discussion 219-20. PubMed ID: 11336381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: toward a shared conceptual framework.
    Jesus TS; Hoenig H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 May; 96(5):960-9. PubMed ID: 25542676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The system for medical rehabilitation in Croatia.
    Jelić M; Sekelj-Kauzlarić K; Vlak T; Bakran Z; Dzidić I; Eldar R
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 28(15):943-8. PubMed ID: 16861202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for evaluating community-based rehabilitation programmes in Chinese communities.
    Chung EY; Packer TL; Yau M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(17-18):1668-82. PubMed ID: 21171842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The truth is in the eye of the beholder? Quality in rehabilitation from the patients' perspective].
    Grande G; Romppel M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2010 Dec; 49(6):376-82. PubMed ID: 21140321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mispredictions and misrecollections: challenges for subjective outcome measurement.
    Smith DM; Brown SL; Ubel PA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 17943514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Outcome quality in rehabilitation of children and adolescents: results of project aiming at the development of a quality assurance programme].
    Farin E; Gustke M; Widera T; Matthies S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Jun; 74(6):358-70. PubMed ID: 21761389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care.
    Duncan PW; Velozo CA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 88(11):1482-7. PubMed ID: 17964893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New directions in pediatric rehabilitation measurement: the growing challenge.
    Ludlow LH; Haley SM
    J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):482-90. PubMed ID: 11272597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Method of the assessment of patients outcome in cardiac rehabilitation by means of quality indicators--a description of the method].
    Röhrig B; Nosper M; Linck-Eleftheriadis S; Strandt G; Salzwedel A; Völler H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2014 Feb; 53(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24217887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conceptual basis of outcome measures.
    Keith RA
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 7873118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Indicators of process and outcome quality in the context of multicenter quality management in cardiac rehabilitation].
    Spyra K; Müller-Fahrnow W; Held K; Karoff M; Nowossadeck E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Jan; 96(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11876046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes: the mainstay of a framework for quality care.
    Peters DA
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1995 Oct; 10(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 7579549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.