These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evaluating current policy for detecting mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: implications for current cell counting practices. Caudill SP; Van Dyke DL; Chen AT; Reidy JA; Ing PS; Schwartz S; Vance GH Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(4):615-22. PubMed ID: 15678412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular diagnosis of sex chromosome mosaics in fetal amniotic cells. Fan Z; Weng X; Pan Z; Fan Q; Long J; Lin G; Yang Q; Sun L Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(25):e26331. PubMed ID: 34160397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the 15-in situ clone protocol necessary to detect amniotic fluid mosaicism? Cheng EY; Luthy DA; Dunne DF; Luthardt FW; Disteche CM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1025-30. PubMed ID: 7485288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Application of different technologies for distinguishing true and pseudo mosaicisms during prenatal diagnosis]. Zhu R; Zhu X; Yang Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Wu X; Wang W; Li J Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 31(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 25297599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revised guidelines for the diagnosis of mosaicism in amniocytes. Hsu LY; Benn PA Prenat Diagn; 1999 Nov; 19(11):1081-82. PubMed ID: 10589067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: determination of number of colonies needed for accurate analysis. Featherstone T; Cheung SW; Spitznagel E; Peakman D Prenat Diagn; 1994 Nov; 14(11):1009-17. PubMed ID: 7877948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chromosome aberrations identified by cytogenetic analysis of the first two clones of cultured amniotic fluid cells compared with QF-PCR results. Jenderny J; Schmidt W; Kochhan L Cytogenet Genome Res; 2014; 142(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 24853086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization assisting in prenatal counseling for amniocentesis karyotyping-detected fetal mosaicism. Su SY; Chueh HY; Li CP; Chang YL; Chang SD; Chen CP Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 54(5):588-91. PubMed ID: 26522116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deviant karyotypes in amniotic fluid cell cultures: a problem in prenatal diagnosis. Nuzzo F; Simoni G; Mottura ; Zuffardi O J Genet Hum; 1975 Oct; 23 SUPPL():246. PubMed ID: 1214165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental mosaic trisomy 21 detected following maternal cell contamination of an amniotic fluid specimen from a normal male pregnancy. Street ML; Barber JC; Boyle TA; Ellis KH; Bullman H; Homfray T Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):858-60. PubMed ID: 17554802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic cell culture. A diagnostic Dilemma. Kohn G; Mennuti MT; Kaback M; Schwartz RM; Chemke J; Goldman B; Mellman WJ Isr J Med Sci; 1975 May; 11(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 1158661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up investigations in uncultured amniotic fluid cells after uncertain cytogenetic results. Van Opstal D; van den Berg C; Galjaard RJ; Los FJ Prenat Diagn; 2001 Feb; 21(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 11241529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of mosaic states in amniotic fluid using the in-situ colony technique. Welborn JL; Lewis JP Clin Genet; 1990 Jul; 38(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 2201467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: efficacy of in situ versus flask techniques. Cheung SW; Spitznagel E; Featherstone T; Crane JP Prenat Diagn; 1990 Jan; 10(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 2315276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. European collaborative study on prenatal diagnosis: mosaicism, pseudomosaicism and single abnormal cells in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Bui TH; Iselius L; Lindsten J Prenat Diagn; 1984; 4 Spec No():145-62. PubMed ID: 6463032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypermodal cells in amniotic fluid cultures: frequency, interpretation, and clinical significance. Simpson JL; Martin AO; Verp MS; Elias S; Patel VA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jun; 143(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 7081343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]