These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11337243)
1. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Song EK; Lee KB Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Comparison of Vertical Mattress and Cross-stitch Suture Techniques and Single- and Double-Row Configurations for the Treatment of Bucket-Handle Medial Meniscal Tears. Nakama GY; Kaleka CC; Franciozi CE; Astur DC; Debieux P; Krob JJ; Aman ZS; Kemler BR; Storaci HW; Dornan GJ; Cohen M; LaPrade RF Am J Sports Med; 2019 Apr; 47(5):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 30897004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Novel Repair Techniques for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: The 2-Tunnel Transtibial Technique, a "Hybrid" Horizontal and Vertical Mattress Suture Configuration, and a Combined "Hybrid Tunnel" Technique. Buckley PS; Kemler BR; Robbins CM; Aman ZS; Storaci HW; Dornan GJ; LaPrade RF Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(3):651-658. PubMed ID: 30624953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refixation: biomechanical evaluation. Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Jul; 12(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 14689168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures. Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position. Robinson JR; Frank EG; Hunter AJ; Jermin PJ; Gill HS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):924-932. PubMed ID: 29364699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up. Moatshe G; Cinque ME; Godin JA; Vap AR; Chahla J; LaPrade RF Am J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 45(13):3104-3110. PubMed ID: 28806092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]