246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11337565)
21. Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas by 18F-FDG-PET.
Younis MH; Abu-Hijleh HA; Aldahamsheh OO; Abualruz A; Thalib L
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 31887730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of delayed 18F-FDG PET in differential diagnosis for malignant soft-tissue tumors.
Hamada K; Tomita Y; Ueda T; Enomoto K; Kakunaga S; Myoui A; Higuchi I; Yoshikawa H; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 20(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 17385305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic usefulness of FDG PET for pancreatic mass lesions.
Koyama K; Okamura T; Kawabe J; Nakata B; Chung KH; Ochi H; Yamada R
Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Jun; 15(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 11545191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in pediatric patients.
Walter F; Federman N; Apichairuk W; Nelson S; Phelps ME; Allen-Auerbach M; Walter MA; Czernin J
Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 28(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21936620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and carbon-11-methionine PET in detection of malignant tumors.
Inoue T; Kim EE; Wong FC; Yang DJ; Bassa P; Wong WH; Korkmaz M; Tansey W; Hicks K; Podoloff DA
J Nucl Med; 1996 Sep; 37(9):1472-6. PubMed ID: 8790196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 68Ga-labeled bombesin studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison with 18F-FDG.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Hohenberger P; Haberkorn U; Mäcke HR; Eisenhut M; Strauss LG
J Nucl Med; 2007 Aug; 48(8):1245-50. PubMed ID: 17631559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of gastric distention in differentiating recurrent tumor from physiologic uptake in the remnant stomach on 18F-FDG PET.
Yun M; Choi HS; Yoo E; Bong JK; Ryu YH; Lee JD
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):953-7. PubMed ID: 15937305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of PET for diagnosis of solid pulmonary lesions with 18F-FDG uptake below the standardized uptake value of 2.5.
Hashimoto Y; Tsujikawa T; Kondo C; Maki M; Momose M; Nagai A; Ohnuki T; Nishikawa T; Kusakabe K
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 16513611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monitoring bone and soft-tissue tumors after carbon-ion radiotherapy using ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography: a retrospective cohort study.
Yanagawa T; Saito K; Kiyohara H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Takagishi K
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Dec; 10():259. PubMed ID: 26691334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET.
Torizuka T; Kanno T; Futatsubashi M; Okada H; Yoshikawa E; Nakamura F; Takekuma M; Maeda M; Ouchi Y
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12843219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [18F-FDG-PET-CT in soft tissue sarcomas: when to image?].
Rodríguez-Alfonso B; Mucientes Rasilla J; Mitjavila Casanovas M; Cardona Arboniés J; Cubedo R
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 24094372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the evaluation of sarcomas: A systematic review.
Lim HJ; Johnny Ong CA; Tan JW; Ching Teo MC
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2019 Nov; 143():1-13. PubMed ID: 31449981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation between glycolytic phenotype and tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET.
Benz MR; Dry SM; Eilber FC; Allen-Auerbach MS; Tap WD; Elashoff D; Phelps ME; Czernin J
J Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 51(8):1174-81. PubMed ID: 20660389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Gayed I; Vu T; Iyer R; Johnson M; Macapinlac H; Swanston N; Podoloff D
J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 14734662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Imaging bone and soft tissue tumors with the proliferation marker [18F]fluorodeoxythymidine.
Buck AK; Herrmann K; Büschenfelde CM; Juweid ME; Bischoff M; Glatting G; Weirich G; Möller P; Wester HJ; Scheidhauer K; Dechow T; Peschel C; Schwaiger M; Reske SN
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 May; 14(10):2970-7. PubMed ID: 18445694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter.
Spence AM; Muzi M; Mankoff DA; O'Sullivan SF; Link JM; Lewellen TK; Lewellen B; Pham P; Minoshima S; Swanson K; Krohn KA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1653-9. PubMed ID: 15471829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. FDG-PET for evaluating musculoskeletal tumors: a review.
Aoki J; Endo K; Watanabe H; Shinozaki T; Yanagawa T; Ahmed AR; Takagishi K
J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 12768492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Functional image in soft tissue sarcomas: An update of the indications of
Rodríguez-Alfonso B; Simó-Perdigó M; Orcajo Rincón J
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(4):233-243. PubMed ID: 32616457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of soft tissue lesions suspicious for liposarcoma by F18-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET).
Schwarzbach MH; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Mechtersheimer G; Hinz U; Willeke F; Cardona S; Attigah N; Strauss LG; Herfarth C; Lehnert T
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(5):3609-14. PubMed ID: 11848531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative dynamic ¹⁸FDG-PET and tracer kinetic analysis of soft tissue sarcomas.
Rusten E; Rødal J; Revheim ME; Skretting A; Bruland OS; Malinen E
Acta Oncol; 2013 Aug; 52(6):1160-7. PubMed ID: 23198721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
