These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11337581)
21. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction. Lonneux M; Borbath I; Bol A; Coppens A; Sibomana M; Bausart R; Defrise M; Pauwels S; Michel C Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10369944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET. Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (ordered-subset expectation maximization) in dynamic positron emission tomography: quantitative effects on kinetic modeling with N-13 ammonia in healthy subjects. Hove JD; Rasmussen R; Freiberg J; Holm S; Kelbaek H; Kofoed KE J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 18674721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET. Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors. Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparing filtered backprojection and ordered-subsets expectation maximization for small-lesion detection and localization in 67Ga SPECT. Wells RG; King MA; Simkin PH; Judy PF; Brill AB; Gifford HC; Licho R; Pretorius PH; Schneider PB; Seldin DW J Nucl Med; 2000 Aug; 41(8):1391-9. PubMed ID: 10945533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of reconstruction parameters during filtered backprojection and ordered-subset expectation maximization in the measurement of the left-ventricular volumes and function during gated SPECT. Duarte DD; Monteiro MS; El Hakmaoui F; Prior JO; Vieira L; Pires-Jorge JA J Nucl Med Technol; 2012 Mar; 40(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22323735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM. Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preliminary evaluation of image reconstruction by ordered-subset expectation maximization in thallium-201 lung scintigraphy. Bai J; Yokoyama K; Kinuya S; Nakajima K; Yamada M; Ichiyanagi K; Michigishi T; Tonami N Ann Nucl Med; 2003 Oct; 17(7):619-24. PubMed ID: 14651366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study. Oda K; Toyama H; Uemura K; Ikoma Y; Kimura Y; Senda M Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction algorithms for High-Resolution Research Tomograph studies: effects of randoms estimation methods. van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Wolfensberger SP; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3217-30. PubMed ID: 18506070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients. Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of ordered-subsets expectation maximization with 3D post-reconstruction Gauss filtering and comparison with filtered backprojection in 99mTc SPECT. Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Dominietto M; Leva L; Secco C; Inglese E Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 19(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15909485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT. Okuda K; Nakajima K; Yamada M; Wakabayashi H; Ichikawa H; Arai H; Matsuo S; Taki J; Hashimoto M; Kinuya S Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 24214735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability. Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [ Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies. Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling. Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]