882 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11337621)
1. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IGF-I and TGF-beta1 application by a poly-(D,L-lactide)-coated cage promotes intervertebral bone matrix formation in the sheep cervical spine.
Kandziora F; Schmidmaier G; Schollmeier G; Bail H; Pflugmacher R; Görke T; Wagner M; Raschke M; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(16):1710-23. PubMed ID: 12195060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematics of cervical spine discectomy with and without bone grafting: quantitative evaluation of late fusion in a sheep model.
Lee EJ; Hung YC; Lee MY; Yan JJ; Lee YT; Chang JH; Chang GL; Chung KC
Neurosurgery; 1999 Jan; 44(1):139-46; discussion 146-7. PubMed ID: 9894974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques.
Barrey C; Mertens P; Jund J; Cotton F; Perrin G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):E140-7. PubMed ID: 15770166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.
Kandziora F; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Schaefer J; Scholz A; Schmidmaier G; Schröder R; Bail H; Duda G; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):321-32. PubMed ID: 11990842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures.
Pait TG; Killefer JA; Arnautovic KI
Neurosurgery; 1996 Oct; 39(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 8880772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part II: Effect of growth factors and carrier systems on interbody fusion].
Kandziora F; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Krummrey G; Schollmeier G; Schmidmaier G; Schnake KJ; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
Chirurg; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1025-38. PubMed ID: 12395162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
