880 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11337621)
21. Effectiveness of cervical zero profile integrated cage with and without supplemental posterior Interfacet stabilization.
Havey RM; Blank KR; Khayatzadeh S; Muriuki MG; Pappu S; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105078. PubMed ID: 32585556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spine fixation after healing in a destabilized cervical spine model in sheep: a comparison of the anterior plating and posterior wiring techniques.
Lee MY; Chang GL; Chang JH; Hung YC; Chang CH; Lee EJ
J Trauma; 2006 Jun; 60(6):1307-14. PubMed ID: 16766976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of anteromedial foraminotomy and the uncovertebral joints in the stability of the cervical spine. A biomechanical study.
Kotani Y; McNulty PS; Abumi K; Cunningham BW; Kaneda K; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jul; 23(14):1559-65. PubMed ID: 9682312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Experimental fusion of the sheep cervical spine. Part I: Effect of cage design on interbody fusion].
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schäfer J; Schollmeier G; Schnake KJ; Bail H; Duda G; Haas NP
Chirurg; 2002 Sep; 73(9):909-17. PubMed ID: 12297957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Biomechanical changes of sheep cervical spine after unilateral hemilaminectomy and different degrees of facetectomy].
Wu C; Wang ZY; Lin GZ; Yu T; Liu B; Si Y; Zhang YB; Li YC
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Aug; 51(4):728-732. PubMed ID: 31420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach.
Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang TM; Hsu CY; Hsu SJ; Shih TF
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3310-7. PubMed ID: 25218506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation.
Salem W; Lenders C; Mathieu J; Hermanus N; Klein P
Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23375147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computed tomography-based determination of a safe trajectory for placement of transarticular facet screws in the subaxial cervical spine.
Jost GF; Bisson EF; Schmidt MH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Apr; 16(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 22284230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.
Anderst WJ; Thorhauer ED; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
Spine J; 2011 Jul; 11(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 21689990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.
Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of BMP-2 and combined IGF-I/TGF-ss1 application in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Knispel C; Hiller T; Schollmeier G; Bail H; Schmidmaier G; Duda G; Raschke M; Haas NP
Eur Spine J; 2002 Oct; 11(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 12384758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
