218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11338133)
61. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A prospective randomised study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of benign diseases of the uterus.
Roy KK; Goyal M; Singla S; Sharma JB; Malhotra N; Kumar S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 21140160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).
Eggemann H; Ignatov A; Frauchiger-Heuer H; Amse T; Costa SD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):479-485. PubMed ID: 29302807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population.
Kovac SR; Barhan S; Lister M; Tucker L; Bishop M; Das A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1521-7. PubMed ID: 12501056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
Harmanli OH; Byun S; Dandolu V; Gaughan JP; Grody MH
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 61(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 16110241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Vaginal hysterectomies in patients without uterine prolapse: a local perspective.
Pun TC
Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Feb; 13(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17277389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Clinical aspects of vaginal hysterectomy].
Hohlweg-Majert P; Kirn R; Mechela A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Dec; 47(12):864-7. PubMed ID: 3436509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
Kovac SR
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The place of oophorectomy at vaginal hysterectomy.
Sheth SS
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):662-6. PubMed ID: 1883789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
Doucette RC; Scott JR
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jan; 41(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8855068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Is vaginal hysterectomy is equally safe for the enlarged and normally sized non-prolapse uterus? A cohort study assessing outcomes.
Newbold P; Vithayathil M; Fatania K; Yoong W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Feb; 185():74-7. PubMed ID: 25528733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. An audit of vaginal hysterectomies at the University College Hospital, Ibadan.
Bello FA; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA
Niger J Med; 2011; 20(4):426-31. PubMed ID: 22288316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Changing routes of hysterectomy: a cross sectional and comparative study.
Shrestha NS; Saha R; Karki C
Nepal Med Coll J; 2010 Sep; 12(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21446367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Vaginal hysterectomy for patients with moderately enlarged uterus of benign lesions.
Li Z; Leng J; Lang J; Tang J
Chin Med Sci J; 2004 Mar; 19(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 15104228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.
Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Optimizing vaginal hysterectomy in women with large volume non-prolapse uteri: a novel minimally-invasive "aneurysm needle clampless technique".
Warda O; Ehab S; Mostafa E; Maged E; Tarek S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Aug; 179():1-4. PubMed ID: 24965970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
