155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11338403)
1. Comparison of three techniques for evaluating skin erythemal response for determination of sun protection factors of sunscreens: high resolution laser Doppler imaging, colorimetry and visual scoring.
Wilhelm KP; Kaspar K; Funkel O
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2001 Apr; 17(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 11338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybrid Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy: Non-Erythemal in vivo Testing of Sun Protection Factor.
Rohr M; Ernst N; Schrader A
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2018; 31(4):220-228. PubMed ID: 29791917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sun protection factor measurement of sunscreens is dependent on minimal erythema dose.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Stc Barnetson R
Br J Dermatol; 1999 Sep; 141(3):502-7. PubMed ID: 10583055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between laser-doppler imaging and colorimetry in the assessment of scarring: "a pilot study".
Peeters W; Anthonissen M; Deliaert A; Van der Hulst R; Van den Kerckhove E
Skin Res Technol; 2012 May; 18(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 22092605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective measurement of minimal erythema and melanogenic doses using natural and solar-simulated light.
Poon TS; Kuchel JM; Badruddin A; Halliday GM; Barnetson RS; Iwaki H; Hatao M
Photochem Photobiol; 2003 Oct; 78(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 14626659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types.
Fluhr JW; Kuss O; Diepgen T; Lazzerini S; Pelosi A; Gloor M; Berardesca E
Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):696-703. PubMed ID: 11736891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardisation of minimal erythematous dose reading and assessment: a new system.
Bertin C; Nollent V; Nkengne A; Oun E; Tokgoz-Engrand S; Mojon A
Skin Res Technol; 2016 Nov; 22(4):423-429. PubMed ID: 26842225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of detection distance-dependent reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of the sun protection factor using pig ear skin.
Reble C; Gersonde I; Schanzer S; Meinke MC; Helfmann J; Lademann J
J Biophotonics; 2018 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 28516475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sunscreens prevent local and systemic immunosuppression of contact hypersensitivity in mice exposed to solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation.
Roberts LK; Beasley DG
J Photochem Photobiol B; 1997 Jun; 39(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 9225458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of the minimal erythema dose and colorimetric measurements as indicators of skin sensitivity to UV-B radiation.
Dornelles S; Goldim J; Cestari T
Photochem Photobiol; 2004 Jun; 79(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15291306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative quantitative analysis of ultraviolet B-induced skin blood flow change using laser Doppler perfusion imaging technique.
Youn JI; Park SB; Park BS; Han WS
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2000 Aug; 16(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 11019941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A sunscreen's labeled sun protection factor may overestimate protection at temperate latitudes: a human in vivo study.
Young AR; Boles J; Herzog B; Osterwalder U; Baschong W
J Invest Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 130(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 20535128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A broad spectrum high-SPF photostable sunscreen with a high UVA-PF can protect against cellular damage at high UV exposure doses.
Cole C; Appa Y; Ou-Yang H
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 24806442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical measurement and evaluation of skin color changes under normal condition and post-ultraviolet radiation: a comparison study of Chromameter CM 2500d and Maxmeter MX18.
Tian Y; Wang YX; Gu WJ; Zhang P; Sun Y; E Y; Liu W
Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 24016335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing blood flow, microvasculature, erythema and redness in hypertrophic scars: A cross sectional study showing different features that require precise definitions.
Jaspers MEH; Stekelenburg CM; Simons JM; Brouwer KM; Vlig M; van den Kerckhove E; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28153584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide greater protection against ultraviolet-radiation-induced suppression of contact hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in humans.
Damian DL; Halliday GM; Barnetson RS
J Invest Dermatol; 1997 Aug; 109(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 9242499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the Influence of the Antiphlogistic Ingredients Panthenol and Bisabolol on the SPF Value in vivo.
Werner M; Herling M; Garbe B; Theek C; Tronnier H; Heinrich U; Braun N
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2017; 30(6):284-291. PubMed ID: 28972949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual variations in the correlation between erythemal threshold, UV-induced DNA damage and sun-burn cell formation.
Heenen M; Giacomoni PU; Golstein P
J Photochem Photobiol B; 2001 Oct; 63(1-3):84-7. PubMed ID: 11684455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative effects from repeated exposures to suberythemal doses of UVB and UVA in human skin.
Lavker RM; Gerberick GF; Veres D; Irwin CJ; Kaidbey KH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1995 Jan; 32(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 7822517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thirty hours' evaluation of UVB-induced erythema by chromometry and microflowmetry.
Procaccini EM; Riccio G; Casula L; Posteraro G; Monfrecola G
Dermatology; 1997; 195(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 9529548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
