These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11340856)

  • 21. Neon colors illuminate reading units.
    Prinzmetal W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):584-97. PubMed ID: 2144573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intrusion patterns in rapid serial visual presentation tasks with two response dimensions.
    Botella J; Garcia ML; Barriopedro M
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 1437487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The illusory-letters phenomenon: an illustration of graphemic restoration in visual word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Scott-Brown KC
    Perception; 1999; 28(11):1413-6. PubMed ID: 10755149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words.
    Perea M; Gotor A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 8873189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orthographic similarity: the case of "reversed anagrams".
    Morris AL; Still ML
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 22396127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A New Demonstration of the Illusory Letters Phenomenon: Graphemic Restoration in Arabic Word Perception.
    Jordan TR; Sheen M; AlJassmi MA; Paterson KB
    Perception; 2015 Feb; 44(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 26561973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of Chinese characters.
    Fang SP; Wu P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):434-47. PubMed ID: 2527953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect.
    Whittlesea BW; Wai KH
    Psychol Res; 1997; 60(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 9342961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words.
    Bavelier D
    Cognition; 1994 Mar; 51(3):199-236. PubMed ID: 8194301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model.
    Durgunoglu AY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 2972798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Calling all codes: interactive effects of semantics, phonology, and orthography produce dissociations in a repetition blindness paradigm.
    Stolz JA; Neely JH
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(1):105-28. PubMed ID: 18437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Illusory words: the roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words.
    Treisman A; Souther J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Feb; 12(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 2939189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masked repetition and phonological priming in picture naming.
    Ferrand L; Humphreys GW; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 9529910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.
    Marmurek HH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 1437488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.
    Eiter BM; Inhoff AW
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 18843502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.