525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11340889)
21. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relation between intraocular pressure peak in the water drinking test and visual field progression in glaucoma.
Susanna R; Vessani RM; Sakata L; Zacarias LC; Hatanaka M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 89(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 16170120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma.
Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Sep; 31(9):1869-75. PubMed ID: 2211033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 14. Distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations.
Kim J; Dally LG; Ederer F; Gaasterland DE; VanVeldhuisen PC; Blackwell B; Sullivan EK; Prum B; Shafranov G; Beck A; Spaeth GL;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2109-16. PubMed ID: 15522379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Wang JC; Gazzard G; Foster PJ; Devereux JG; Oen FT; Chew PT; Khaw PT; Seah SK
Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15069431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities.
Hart WM; Silverman SE; Trick GL; Nesher R; Gordon MO
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 2303333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of a five-degree visual field between two programs of different testing field range.
Fujimoto N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):866-7. PubMed ID: 17452172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Hutchison DM; LeBlanc RP; Artes PH; Nicolela MT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 89(8):1008-12. PubMed ID: 16024855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Visual field defects in 169 cases of pituitary adenomas].
Shen MQ; Ye W; Zhang YY; Chen J
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 45(12):1074-9. PubMed ID: 20193428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.
Hutchings N; Hosking SL; Wild JM; Flanagan JG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Sep; 42(10):2332-7. PubMed ID: 11527947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
