These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11340889)

  • 21. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relation between intraocular pressure peak in the water drinking test and visual field progression in glaucoma.
    Susanna R; Vessani RM; Sakata L; Zacarias LC; Hatanaka M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 89(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 16170120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Sep; 31(9):1869-75. PubMed ID: 2211033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 14. Distinguishing progression of glaucoma from visual field fluctuations.
    Kim J; Dally LG; Ederer F; Gaasterland DE; VanVeldhuisen PC; Blackwell B; Sullivan EK; Prum B; Shafranov G; Beck A; Spaeth GL;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2109-16. PubMed ID: 15522379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of manual Goldmann and automated static visual fields using the Dicon 2000 perimeter in the detection of chiasmal tumors.
    Wirtschafter JD; Coffman SM
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1984 Aug; 16(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 6497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D; Crenguţa MI; Danielescu C; Mihaela NM
    Oftalmologia; 2006; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
    de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
    Wang JC; Gazzard G; Foster PJ; Devereux JG; Oen FT; Chew PT; Khaw PT; Seah SK
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15069431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma.
    Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Hyman L; Leske MC;
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2271-6. PubMed ID: 19854514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
    Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities.
    Hart WM; Silverman SE; Trick GL; Nesher R; Gordon MO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 2303333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Vigabatrin and visual field defects. A Danish material with evaluation of different screening methods].
    Riise P; Fledelius HC; Rogvi-Hansen Bà
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(10):1034-8. PubMed ID: 12645411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of a five-degree visual field between two programs of different testing field range.
    Fujimoto N
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):866-7. PubMed ID: 17452172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Central corneal thickness and progression of the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; Hutchison DM; LeBlanc RP; Artes PH; Nicolela MT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 89(8):1008-12. PubMed ID: 16024855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Visual field defects in 169 cases of pituitary adenomas].
    Shen MQ; Ye W; Zhang YY; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 45(12):1074-9. PubMed ID: 20193428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients.
    Hutchings N; Hosking SL; Wild JM; Flanagan JG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Sep; 42(10):2332-7. PubMed ID: 11527947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.