These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11341142)

  • 1. Continuing review of research approved by Canadian research ethics boards.
    Weijer C
    CMAJ; 2001 May; 164(9):1305-6. PubMed ID: 11341142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The conduct of Canadian researchers and institutional review boards regarding substituted consent for research.
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Paquet M
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15281211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When a research subject calls with a complaint, what will the institutional review board do?
    Motil KJ; Allen J; Taylor A
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 15281212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working with human research protections.
    Arford PH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2004; 36(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 15495497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rules of the game: institutional review boards.
    Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 18375265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing the effectiveness of REBs.
    Fuks A; Beauvais C
    NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 15468467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical issues in the substantive and procedural aspects of research ethics review.
    Meslin EM
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 10125789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who should foot the bill for continuing review of research?
    Mendelson J; Cantini F
    CMAJ; 2001 Oct; 165(8):1004-5. PubMed ID: 11699691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical ethics committees: a physician's perspective.
    Kinsella TD
    Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1988 May; 21(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 11650083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unity in diversity.
    Nicholson RH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(1):6. PubMed ID: 10052004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
    Hogue LL
    Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New initiative to accredit all institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11658058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
    Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of research ethics review mechanisms and the ICH good clinical practice guideline.
    Hirtle M; Lemmens T; Sprumont D
    Eur J Health Law; 2000 Sep; 7(3):265-292. PubMed ID: 12174854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Office of Human Research Protections.
    Chamberlain B
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Descriptive ethics: a qualitative study of local research ethics committees in Mexico.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Turnbull B; Garduño-Espinosa J; Porter JD
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 May; 6(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16594973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the level of statistician participation on Canadian-based research ethics boards.
    Thabane L; Childs A; Lafontaine A
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 15948326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The institutional review board: an evolving ethics committee.
    Lind SE
    J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 1463879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?
    Ashcroft RE
    New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 15706668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies.
    Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C
    IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.