179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11342310)
1. Is there any difference in PBPC mobilization between cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma?
Dazzi C; Cariello A; Rosti G; Argnani M; Sebastiani L; Ferrari E; Zornetta L; Monti G; Nicoletti P; Baioni M; Salvucci M; Scarpi E; Marangolo M
Leuk Lymphoma; 2000 Oct; 39(3-4):301-10. PubMed ID: 11342310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No polarization of type 1 or type 2 precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood stem cell collections of non-hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, GM-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF.
Gazitt Y; Akay C; Thomas C
Stem Cells Dev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 16646673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.
Cesana C; Carlo-Stella C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Sammarelli G; Caramatti C; Tabilio A; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Mar; 21(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 9543059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Lee JL; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim SB; Kang YK; Lee J; Kim MW; Park CJ; Chi HS; Huh J; Kim SH; Suh C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Mar; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15654353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.
Gazitt Y; Callander N; Freytes CO; Shaughnessy P; Liu Q; Tsai TW; Devore P
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):737-48. PubMed ID: 11091498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing of platelet recovery is associated with adequacy of leukapheresis product yield after cyclophosphamide and G-CSF in patients with lymphoma.
Zimmerman TM; Michelson GC; Mick R; Grinblatt DL; Williams SF
J Clin Apher; 1999; 14(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10355661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expression of the adhesion molecules CD49d and CD49e on G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cells of patients with solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma and of healthy donors is inversely correlated with the amount of mobilized CD34+ cells.
Zeller W; Kröger N; Berger J; Krueger W; Dierlamm J; Stockschläder M; Gutensohn K; Hossfeld DK; Zander AR
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 1999 Oct; 8(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 10791904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors for successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with ESHAP + G-CSF in patients with pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Liu JH; Chen CC; Bai LY; Chao SC; Chang MS; Lin JS
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jun; 71(6):279-85. PubMed ID: 18567557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization kinetics of peripheral blood progenitor cells after IAPVP-16 salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF in lymphoproliferative disorders.
Altés A; López R; Martino R; Martinez C; Cabezudo E; Muñoz L; Santamaría A; Perea G; Briones J; Salar A; Sureda A; Brunet S; Madoz P; Sierra J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jul; 26(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10918421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection without close monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cells: A feasible strategy for multiple myeloma or pre-treated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma patients mobilized with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
Callera F; Cavenaghi L; de Melo CM
Transfus Apher Sci; 2009 Apr; 40(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19233728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The composition of leukapheresis products impacts on the hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation independently of the mobilization regimen.
Menéndez P; Caballero MD; Prosper F; Del Cañizo MC; Pérez-Simón JA; Mateos MV; Nieto MJ; Corral M; Romero M; García-Conde J; Montalbán MA; San Miguel JF; Orfao A
Transfusion; 2002 Sep; 42(9):1159-72. PubMed ID: 12430673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized phase 2 study of PBPC mobilization by stem cell factor and filgrastim in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Stiff P; Gingrich R; Luger S; Wyres MR; Brown RA; LeMaistre CF; Perry J; Schenkein DP; List A; Mason JR; Bensinger W; Wheeler C; Freter C; Parker WRL ; Emmanouilides C
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Sep; 26(5):471-81. PubMed ID: 11019835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma.
Moskowitz CH; Glassman JR; Wuest D; Maslak P; Reich L; Gucciardo A; Coady-Lyons N; Zelenetz AD; Nimer SD
Clin Cancer Res; 1998 Feb; 4(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 9516916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of whole blood and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and new strategies for rescue after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer.
Filip S; Bláha M; Odrázka K; Mericka P; Vávrová J
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Feb; 9(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10738969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-dose therapy followed by autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation for patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using unprimed and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral-blood stem cells.
Nademanee A; Sniecinski I; Schmidt GM; Dagis AC; O'Donnell MR; Snyder DS; Parker PM; Stein AS; Smith EP; Molina A
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Oct; 12(10):2176-86. PubMed ID: 7523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Aurlien E; Holte H; Pharo A; Kvaløy S; Jakobsen E; Smeland EB; Kvalheim G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 May; 21(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 9613778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Circulating stem cell collection in lymphoma and myeloma after mobilization with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous transplantation.
Cancelas JA; Hernández-Jodra M; Zamora C; Perez-Oteyza J; Brieva JA; Roldan E; Navas G; Garcia-Laraña J; Lopez J; Odriozola J
Vox Sang; 1994; 67(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 7535498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
