BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11342310)

  • 21. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) through a combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF in breast cancer patients and a possibility of unprocessed whole blood collection.
    Vanásek J; Filip S; Medková V; Bláha M; Mericka P; Volenec K
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Jan; 21(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9489627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization.
    Passos-Coelho JL; Braine HG; Davis JM; Huelskamp AM; Schepers KG; Ohly K; Clarke B; Wright SK; Noga SJ; Davidson NE
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Mar; 13(3):705-14. PubMed ID: 7533827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Increase of mobilized CD34-positive peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and cancer of the testis.
    Zeller W; Gutensohn K; Stockschläder M; Dierlamm J; Kröger N; Koehne G; Hummel K; Kabisch H; Weh HJ; Kühnl P; Hossfeld DK; Zander AR
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 May; 17(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 8733686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF.
    Fraipont V; Sautois B; Baudoux E; Pereira M; Fassotte MF; Hermanne JP; Jérusalem G; Longrée L; Schaaf-Lafontaine N; Fillet G; Beguin Y
    Transfusion; 2000 Mar; 40(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 10738037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. GM-CSF-based mobilization effect in normal healthy donors for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
    Sohn SK; Kim JG; Seo KW; Chae YS; Jung JT; Suh JS; Lee KB
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2002 Jul; 30(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 12132046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
    Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
    Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transplantation potential of peripheral whole blood primed by VACOP-B chemotherapy plus filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lumphoma.
    Corato A; Ambrosetti A; Rossi B; Vincenzi C; Lambiase A; Perona G; Pizzolo G; de Wynter E; Nadali G
    J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 11091491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Successful autografting following myeloablative conditioning therapy with blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy plus rhG-CSF.
    Hohaus S; Goldschmidt H; Ehrhardt R; Haas R
    Exp Hematol; 1993 Apr; 21(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 7681782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment with plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients to increase the number of peripheral blood stem cells when given a mobilizing regimen of G-CSF: implications for the heavily pretreated patient.
    Stiff P; Micallef I; McCarthy P; Magalhaes-Silverman M; Weisdorf D; Territo M; Badel K; Calandra G
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2009 Feb; 15(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 19167685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blood progenitor cell (BPC) mobilization studied in multiple myeloma, solid tumor and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients after combination chemotherapy and G-CSF.
    Engelhardt M; Winkler J; Waller C; Lange W; Mertelsmann R; Henschler R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Mar; 19(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 9181898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation of colony-forming cells, long-term culture initiating cells and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients mobilized for peripheral blood progenitors with different regimens.
    Bender JG; Lum L; Unverzagt KL; Lee W; Van Epps D; George S; Coon J; Ghalie R; McLeod B; Kaizer H
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1994 Apr; 13(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 7517260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved priming for mobilization of and optimal timing for harvest of peripheral blood stem cells.
    Knudsen LM; Gaarsdal E; Jensen L; Nielsen KJ; Nikolaisen K; Johnsen HE
    J Hematother; 1996 Aug; 5(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 8877715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Matched-pair analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using G-CSF vs. cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF: enhanced CD34+ cell collections are not necessarily cost-effective.
    Akard LP; Thompson JM; Dugan MJ; Wiemann M; Greenspan A; Hanks S; Swinney M; Nyhuis A; Jansen J
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1999; 5(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 10595815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clonogenic potential and phenotypic analysis of CD34+ cells mobilized by different chemotherapy regimens.
    Cesana C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Caramatti C; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
    Haematologica; 1999 Sep; 84(9):771-8. PubMed ID: 10477448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.
    Ahn JS; Park S; Im SA; Yoon SS; Lee JS; Kim BK; Bang SM; Cho EK; Lee JH; Jung CW; Kim HC; Seong CM; Lee MH; Kim CS; Lee KS; Lee JA; Ahn MJ
    Korean J Intern Med; 2005 Sep; 20(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16295781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. G-CSF alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment.
    Milone G; Leotta S; Indelicato F; Mercurio S; Moschetti G; Di Raimondo F; Tornello A; Consoli U; Guido G; Giustolisi R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 May; 31(9):747-54. PubMed ID: 12732880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection.
    Engelhardt M; Bertz H; Afting M; Waller CF; Finke J
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):2160-72. PubMed ID: 10561272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
    Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.