These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11343017)

  • 21. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs.
    Lee MS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Cha KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 20620830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
    Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beauty and the teeth: perception of tooth color and its influence on the overall judgment of facial attractiveness.
    Höfel L; Lange M; Jacobsen T
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Aug; 27(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 17726991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elliptic Fourier analysis of facial profiles during growth and development.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dellavia C; Ciusa V; Serrao G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12596695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the Effect of Simulated Rhinoplasty and Genioplasty on the Facial Profile Attractiveness of Patients with a Convex Face.
    Sadeghian S; Shirvani A; Azamian Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):719-725. PubMed ID: 29959302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness.
    Edler R; Agarwal P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 28(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 16415084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Facial effects of fetal alcohol exposure: assessment by photographs and morphometric analysis.
    Clarren SK; Sampson PD; Larsen J; Donnell DJ; Barr HM; Bookstein FL; Martin DC; Streissguth AP
    Am J Med Genet; 1987 Mar; 26(3):651-66. PubMed ID: 3565480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Facial attractiveness and abnormality of nasal reconstruction patients and controls assessed by laypersons.
    Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Jun; 61(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 18222114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.