These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11344432)

  • 1. Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.
    Leggett PL; Bissell CD; Churchman-Winn R; Ahn C
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 11344432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases.
    Lee KW; Poon CM; Leung KF; Lee DW; Ko CW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2005 Feb; 11(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15687513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Leggett PL; Churchman-Winn R; Miller G
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Jan; 14(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 10653232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an additional needle grasper: a novel technique.
    Komine O; Suzuki H; Watanabe M; Nomura S; Mizutani S; Yoshino M; Chihara N; Mishima K; Oyama R; Uchida E
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2015; 82(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 25797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One, two, or three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Justo-Janeiro JM; Vincent GT; Vázquez de Lara F; de la Rosa Paredes R; Orozco EP; Vázquez de Lara LG
    Int Surg; 2014; 99(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 25437581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Comparison of Four-Port, Two-Port Without Suspension Suture and Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Results.
    Sulu B; Allahverdi TD; Altun H; Koksal N
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 26935504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tip for microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: easy removal of the gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the three-port technique.
    Kang KJ; Lim TJ
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Apr; 13(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 12709619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early experience in single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Chang SK; Tan SS; Kok YO
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Jun; 53(6):377-80. PubMed ID: 22711035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-port cholecystectomy maintains safety and feasibility in benign gallbladder diseases: a comparative study.
    Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25053130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port.
    Barband A; Fakhree MB; Kakaei F; Daryani A
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 22318053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Zhang L; Sah B; Ma J; Shang C; Huang Z; Chen Y
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Apr; 28(4):1131-5. PubMed ID: 24202712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness.
    Yu SC; Yuan RH; Chen SC; Lee WJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1999 Feb; 9(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 10194694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total 5-mm port approach: a feasible technique for both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Bender K; Lewin J; O'Rourke H; Hugh FC; O'Rourke N; Hugh TJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Nov; 88(11):E751-E755. PubMed ID: 29687556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study.
    Han HJ; Choi SB; Kim WB; Lee JS; Boo YJ; Song TJ; Suh SO; Choi SY
    Am Surg; 2012 Apr; 78(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 22472410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Chatterjee A; Kumar R; Chattoraj A
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52196. PubMed ID: 38347985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative port-site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs. umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Siddiqui NA; Azami R; Murtaza G; Nasim S
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 22449831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.
    Wong JS; Cheung YS; Fong KW; Chong CC; Lee KF; Wong J; Lai PB
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22318055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.
    Pan MX; Jiang ZS; Cheng Y; Xu XP; Zhang Z; Qin JS; He GL; Xu TC; Zhou CJ; Liu HY; Gao Y
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 19(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 23372363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison study of left-hand three-port videoscopy, left-hand four-port videoscopy and standard four-port videoscopy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Besler E; Koksal HM; Uludag M
    Ann Ital Chir; 2019; 90():341-349. PubMed ID: 31112517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.