190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11345394)
1. Changing guidelines on conflict of interest.
Parmley WW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(6):1749-50. PubMed ID: 11345394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
McCrary SV; Anderson CB; Jakovljevic J; Khan T; McCullough LB; Wray NP; Brody BA
N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(22):1621-6. PubMed ID: 11096171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tobacco industry manipulation of research.
Bero LA
Public Health Rep; 2005; 120(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 15842123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-starters and no brainers: an outside perspective.
David EE
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 11656992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National Institutes of Health. Healy and Dingell lock horns.
Aldhous P
Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):461. PubMed ID: 1865895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dr Healy, Dr Kennedy and Mr Dingell.
Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):457-8. PubMed ID: 1865893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.
Angell M
JAMA; 2008 Sep; 300(9):1069-71. PubMed ID: 18768418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.
Friedman PJ
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 11651613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAMC Task Force issues first Financial Conflict of Interest Guidelines, and GAO urges HHS to reexamine financial conflict of interest guidance and regulations for NIH-funded research. Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. General Accounting Office. Department of Health and Human Services.
J Investig Med; 2002 Mar; 50(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 11928944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research ethics. Studies trace patchwork of conflict policies.
Agnew B
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1873. PubMed ID: 11187038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Industry relationships between physicians and professional medical associations: corrupt or essential?
Smith CD; MacFadyen B
Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 20087748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson).
Swazey JP
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research fundamentals VI: misconduct in biomedical research.
Biros MH; Fish SS; Taggart P
Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Aug; 6(8):840-8. PubMed ID: 10463558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sharing statistical data in the biomedical and health sciences: ethical, institutional, legal, and professional dimensions.
Fienberg SE
Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():1-18. PubMed ID: 8054076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian whistleblower row prompts broader code of conduct.
Spurgeon D
Nature; 1998 Dec 24-31; 396(6713):715. PubMed ID: 9874365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Confronting conflict of interest in research organisations: time for national action.
Kamien M
Med J Aust; 2002 Mar; 176(5):243. PubMed ID: 11999248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
Green HP
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
Anderson J
J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
