258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11345675)
21. Medicaid expansion: the dynamic health care policy landscape.
Hahn JA; Sheingold BH
Nurs Econ; 2013; 31(6):267-72, 297. PubMed ID: 24592530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Who foots the bill? HMOs confront the rising popularity of designer drugs.
Shinkman R
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jun; 28(26):162. PubMed ID: 10182332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Prescription of Viagra: the Medical Products Agency does recommend].
Byström J
Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):870. PubMed ID: 10741034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Beyond Incrementalism? SCHIP and the politics of health reform.
Oberlander JB; Lyons B
Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(3):w399-410. PubMed ID: 19293178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Move over, Viagra.
Gupta S
Time; 2003 Sep; 162(9):66. PubMed ID: 12964401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Welfare reform as we know it.
Dauner CD
Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 10167144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medicare Part D: successes and continuing challenges. Impact of Medicare Part D on Massachusetts health programs and beneficiaries.
Thomas CP; Sussman J; ;
Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum); 2007 May; (32):1-32. PubMed ID: 17546802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Health insurance flexibility and accountability initiative: opportunities and issues for states.
Engquist G; Burns P
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2002 Aug; 3(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 12211258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Poor program's progress: the unanticipated politics of Medicaid policy.
Brown LD; Sparer MS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 12528837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. States' control of prescription drug spending: a heterogeneous approach.
Morden NE; Sullivan SD
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):1032-8. PubMed ID: 16012143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magic bullets.
Friedman E
Health Forum J; 1999; 42(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 10539014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Kidnapped.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1997 Mar; 29(12):568-71. PubMed ID: 10166467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medicaid under the knife? Congress considering funding cuts in program.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(13):6-7. PubMed ID: 15077348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. States vs. the feds: who gets control?
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1993 Aug; 11(9):56-7. PubMed ID: 10127882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comprehensive care. Mass. lawmakers aim to reduce uninsured.
Mantone J
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(47):4. PubMed ID: 16334350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The contraception misconception: why prescription contraceptives should be covered by employer insurance plans.
White JN
Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 31(1):271-302. PubMed ID: 15212034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medicaid: a policy menu. Congress has more options for Medicaid than some suspect.
Scheppach RC
Health Syst Rev; 1995; 28(3):19-21. PubMed ID: 10143173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Playing the lottery: HCBS lawsuits and other Medicaid litigation on behalf of the developmentally disabled.
Feltz MK
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):181-238. PubMed ID: 12013699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medicaid hits home and states struggle.
Scott JS
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Jul; 57(7):30-1. PubMed ID: 12866152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The budget deal.
Davidson D
GHA Today; 1997 Sep; 41(9):5. PubMed ID: 10182904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
