These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11345885)

  • 1. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege--Part Two.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 11345885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege.
    Devlin MM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 11280209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developments in peer review.
    Kinderman K
    J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(5):251-3. PubMed ID: 12058695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer-review showdown. High court review could lead to opening records.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec; 37(48):10. PubMed ID: 18203353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
    Blesch G
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(2):17. PubMed ID: 18260535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Oct; 24(10):153-4. PubMed ID: 10621281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence: discovery and "medical peer review" committee privileges.
    Halpern A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 11317431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To review or not to review: antitrust liabilities and peer review protections.
    Acevedo LJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):321-36, 351-2. PubMed ID: 10138598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from discovery in litigation.
    Smart CM
    Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 9604664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FL: does peer review apply to nurses notes?: defendant dr. attempts to invoke peer privilege.
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):3. PubMed ID: 10223027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Special report: new paradigms in credentialing. Peer review process called into question.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Aug; 24(8):123-6. PubMed ID: 10621289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ninth Circuit clarifies immunity requirements and puts more teeth into the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Fogel PD; Phillips EJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Nov; 27(11):337-40, 352. PubMed ID: 10138599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: the struggle goes on.
    Hollowell EE; Wilson RL; Graves DC
    Leg Med; 1989; ():181-200. PubMed ID: 2700006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kentucky statute does not protect peer review information. Sisters of Charity Health Systems, Inc. v. Raikes.
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1999; 19(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 10538018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
    Dollar CJ
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tale of two doctors.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1995 Jan; 12(3):3-8. PubMed ID: 10139499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidentiary privilege for peer review documents rejected by the Fourth Circuit. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 May; 19(7):6-8. PubMed ID: 11989437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.