236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11345892)
21. Resident assessments come up short.
Hegland A
Contemp Longterm Care; 1993 Jan; 16(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10123527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Surviving the survey. New process turns up the heat on administrators.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Nov; 18(11):69-70. PubMed ID: 10153600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. HCFA nursing home report revives debate on new rules.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(37):8. PubMed ID: 10151387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Long-term care plan gets rolling.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1999 May; 25(5):49-50. PubMed ID: 10387601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA to allow imposition of CMPs (civil monetary penalties) up to $10,000 for single violations.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Apr; 7(7):1, 4-5. PubMed ID: 10351614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. High standards. Skewed survey nails nursing homes.
Blesch G
Mod Healthc; 2008 Oct; 38(40):14. PubMed ID: 18975399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Nursing home probe's findings misleading, industry sources say.
Shriver K
Mod Healthc; 1995 Sep; 25(36):96, 107. PubMed ID: 10145186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. HCFA issues proposed rule for nursing home survey process.
Banach J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Feb; 59(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 10302154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Expect more unannounced surveys. The Joint Commission and HCFA increase the number of surprise visits.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Mar; 16(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11066609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Paying the piper: HCFA guidance on survey revisits raises concerns about continuation of penalties.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Oct; 8(21):3-4. PubMed ID: 11213763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. HCFA to use quality indicators as survey tool under new protocol.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 May; 7(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 10538073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. HCFA to crack down on use of chemical restraints.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Jan; 9(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 11291142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Pursuing survey system solutions.
Gold MF
Provider; 2001 Apr; 27(4):20-3, 26, 29-33. PubMed ID: 11301645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Working the web. Massachusetts providers lobby for better online survey.
Bonifazi WL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 Jul; 22(7):25. PubMed ID: 10539184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How to prepare for the new HCFA survey procedures.
Kelly R; Skelton N
Provider; 1989 Oct; 15(10):48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 10295724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Sometimes it pays to appeal survey findings.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Feb; 21(2):69. PubMed ID: 10177553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. HCFA releases indicators to assess drug reviews.
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1982 May; 8(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 10255272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Update: the new long-term care survey process.
Balcerzak SJ
J Long Term Care Adm; 1985; 13(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 10300611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality care is key to survey success.
Siclari PM
Provider; 1991 Jul; 17(7):14-6, 19-20, 23. PubMed ID: 10114252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medicare and Medicaid termination procedures.
Hamme JM; Kanner SR
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Oct; 9(10):24-7. PubMed ID: 10301341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
