These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Federal agency says researcher misled colleagues and institutional administrators. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer institute to tighten control of trials. Gavaghan H Nature; 1994 Apr; 368(6473):679. PubMed ID: 8152474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats? Tokarski C J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns. Shalev M Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Scheetz MD Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases. Mosimann JE IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint. Price AR J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bill would force journals to follow misconduct rules. Anderson C Nature; 1992 May; 357(6373):7. PubMed ID: 1315423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud. O'Reilly JT Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of the "scientific misconduct" issue: An historical overview. Lafollette MC Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 10964254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]