These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11346763)

  • 1. Philanthropists are paying their dues.
    Barres BA
    Nature; 2001 May; 411(6834):132. PubMed ID: 11346763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers face 'Catch-22' grants trap.
    Ibáñez CF
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6725):280. PubMed ID: 10192324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Freedom to fund.
    Aschwanden C
    Cell; 2007 Feb; 128(3):421-3. PubMed ID: 17289559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AIDS office opposes outside planning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6577):5. PubMed ID: 8609987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Managing the business of science.
    Boron WF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2009 Feb; 24():2-3. PubMed ID: 19196646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patent medicine.
    Baker D
    J Public Health Policy; 2001; 22(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 11603309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grappling for grants.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):3. PubMed ID: 12397310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fight against terror 'needs science institute'.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):887. PubMed ID: 12087368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The inside track.
    Bergeron K
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7057):311. PubMed ID: 16173122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Training programmes with vision.
    Kreeger K
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):5. PubMed ID: 12024174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Funding policies of early philanthropists.
    Ramos MC
    Nursingconnections; 1991; 4(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 2030765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem-cell giveaway proposed as confusion reigns over cell count.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6849):753-4. PubMed ID: 11518925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):390. PubMed ID: 18339262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Budget policy. U.S. science adviser tells researchers to look elsewhere.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 May; 316(5826):817-8. PubMed ID: 17495147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH ponders issues of scale in protein push.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 May; 417(6885):107. PubMed ID: 12000925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.