211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11347879)
1. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli.
Spencer KM; Dien J; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):343-58. PubMed ID: 11347879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Progress of study in auditory event-related potentials of novel events].
Liu B; Zhang Z; Liu Z; Wang M; Zhu Q
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):705-8. PubMed ID: 17713294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array.
Spencer KM; Dien J; Donchin E
Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 10352565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis.
Talsma D; Kok A
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):689-706. PubMed ID: 12462498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Poststimulus EEG spectral analysis and P300: attention, task, and probability.
Spencer KM; Polich J
Psychophysiology; 1999 Mar; 36(2):220-32. PubMed ID: 10194969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence for a new late positive ERP component in an attended novelty oddball task.
McDonald CG; Gabbay FH; Rietschel JC; Duncan CC
Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 20230498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes.
Suzuki J; Nittono H; Hori T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15598514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tracking the voluntary control of auditory spatial attention with event-related brain potentials.
Störmer VS; Green JJ; McDonald JJ
Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 19170950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory spatial tuning in late-onset blindness in humans.
Fieger A; Röder B; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Hillyard SA; Neville HJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16494677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates.
Kayser J; Tenke CE
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 16356768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
Kayser J; Tenke CE
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
