BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11347998)

  • 1. Evaluation of an optical microbiological method for rapidly estimating populations of aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from ground pork.
    Russell SM
    J Food Prot; 2001 May; 64(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 11347998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the MicroFoss system for enumeration of total viable count, Escherichia coli and coliforms in ground beef.
    Odumeru JA; Belvedere J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Jun; 50(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 11943356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of hot water pasteurizing treatments on the microbiological condition of manufacturing beef used for hamburger patty manufacture.
    Gill CO; Bryant J; Badoni M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 63(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 11246908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the petrifilm plate method for the enumeration of aerobic microorganisms and coliforms in retailed meat samples.
    Park YH; Seo KS; Ahn JS; Yoo HS; Kim SP
    J Food Prot; 2001 Nov; 64(11):1841-3. PubMed ID: 11726171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the traditional three-tube most probable number method with the Petrifilm, SimPlate, BioSys optical, and Bactometer conductance methods for enumerating Escherichia coli from chicken carcasses and ground beef.
    Russell SM
    J Food Prot; 2000 Sep; 63(9):1179-83. PubMed ID: 10983789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Sanita-kun E. coli & coliform sheet medium for the enumeration of total coliforms and E. coli.
    Ushiyama M; Iwasaki M
    J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(1):163-83. PubMed ID: 20334178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an automated most-probable-number technique with traditional plating methods for estimating populations of total aerobes, coliforms, and Escherichia coli associated with freshly processed broiler chickens.
    Line JE; Stern NJ; Oakley BB; Seal BS
    J Food Prot; 2011 Sep; 74(9):1558-63. PubMed ID: 21902928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of the BioSys optical assay and the violet red bile agar method for detecting coliforms in food products.
    Firstenberg-Eden R; Foti D; McDougal S; Beck S
    J Food Prot; 2004 Dec; 67(12):2760-6. PubMed ID: 15633683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year (2003) nationwide pork carcass microbiological baseline data survey in Taiwan.
    Yeh KS; Chen SP; Lin JH
    J Food Prot; 2005 Mar; 68(3):458-61. PubMed ID: 15771166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria and Escherichia coli in minced meat and on carcass surface samples with an automated most-probable-number method compared with colony count protocols.
    Paulsen P; Schopf E; Smulders FJ
    J Food Prot; 2006 Oct; 69(10):2500-3. PubMed ID: 17066934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbial and quality attributes of ground pork prepared from commercial pork trim treated with combination intervention processes.
    Castelo MM; Koohmaraie M; Berry ED
    J Food Prot; 2001 Dec; 64(12):1981-7. PubMed ID: 11770627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Substrate supporting disc method for confirmed detection of total coliforms and E. coli in all foods: collaborative study.
    Feldsine PT; Falbo-Nelson MT; Hustead DL
    J AOAC Int; 1993; 76(5):988-1005. PubMed ID: 8241828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a conductance method for enumerating Escherichia coli on chicken, pork, fish, beef, and milk.
    Edmiston AL; Russell SM
    J Food Prot; 1999 Nov; 62(11):1260-5. PubMed ID: 10571314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the microbial quality of Tajik sambusa and control of Clostridium perfringens germination and outgrowth by buffered sodium citrate and potassium lactate.
    Yarbaeva SN; Velugoti PR; Thippareddi H; Albrecht JA
    J Food Prot; 2008 Jan; 71(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18236666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe.
    Mhone TA; Matope G; Saidi PT
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Dec; 151(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 21944662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of combination treatment processes for the microbial decontamination of pork trim.
    Castelo MM; Kang DH; Siragusa GR; Koohmaraie M; Berry ED
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 11252476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing.
    Gill CO; Badoni M; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 11252475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extent of microbial contamination in United States pork retail products.
    Duffy EA; Belk KE; Sofos JN; Bellinger GR; Pape A; Smith GC
    J Food Prot; 2001 Feb; 64(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 11271763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the SimPlate coliform and Escherichia coli test with Petrifilm, three-tube MPN, and VRBA + MUG methods for enumerating coliforms and E. coli in food.
    Townsend DE; Irving RL; Naqui A
    J Food Prot; 1998 Apr; 61(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 9709208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matrix Extension Study: Validation of the Compact Dry EC Method for Enumeration of Escherichia coli and non-E. coli Coliform Bacteria in Selected Foods.
    Mizuochi S; Nelson M; Baylis C; Green B; Jewell K; Monadjemi F; Chen Y; Salfinger Y; Fernandez MC
    J AOAC Int; 2016; 99(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 26965216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.