These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11349168)

  • 1. Early transvaginal ultrasonography versus early cerclage in women with an unclear history of incompetent cervix.
    Kelly S; Pollock M; Maas B; Lefebvre C; Manley J; Sciscione A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1097-9. PubMed ID: 11349168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Houlihan C; Vintzileos A; Ivan J; Benito C; Kappy K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 175(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 8765271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention.
    Giraldo-Isaza MA; Fried GP; Hegarty SE; Suescum-Diaz MA; Cohen AW; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 208(3):209.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23201330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results.
    Althuisius SM; Dekker GA; van Geijn HP; Bekedam DJ; Hummel P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):823-9. PubMed ID: 11035320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controversies regarding cervical incompetence, short cervix, and the need for cerclage.
    Althuisius S; Dekker G
    Clin Perinatol; 2004 Dec; 31(4):695-720, v-vi. PubMed ID: 15519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical incompetence: the use of transvaginal sonography to provide an objective diagnosis.
    Macdonald R; Smith P; Vyas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 18(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11555448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of therapeutic McDonald cerclage on cervical length as assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography.
    Althuisius SM; Dekker GA; van Geijn HP; Hummel P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 180(2 Pt 1):366-9. PubMed ID: 9988802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short cervical length by ultrasound and cerclage.
    Hibbard JU; Snow J; Moawad AH
    J Perinatol; 2000; 20(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 10802840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change in cervical length after cerclage as a predictor of preterm delivery.
    Dijkstra K; Funai EF; O'Neill L; Rebarber A; Paidas MJ; Young BK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 10960624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cerclage in early pregnancy.
    Angel JL; Pietrantoni M; O'Brien WF; Knuppel RA
    J Perinatol; 1991 Sep; 11(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 1919825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature.
    Rozenberg P; Gillet A; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 11896957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of cervical ultrasound screening in determining the timing of emergency cerclage.
    Tezcan B; Hezelgrave N; Shennan A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jul; 32(5):444-6. PubMed ID: 22663315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of cervical cerclage for sonographically incompetent cervix in at high risk patients.
    Shamshad ; Mustajab Y; Jehanzaib M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 19385453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical incompetence: a reappraisal of an obstetric controversy.
    Althuisius SM; Dekker GA; van Geijn HP
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2002 Jun; 57(6):377-87. PubMed ID: 12140372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical length < or = 25 mm in low-risk women: a case control study of cerclage with rest vs rest alone.
    Incerti M; Ghidini A; Locatelli A; Poggi SH; Pezzullo JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):315.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17826435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data.
    Berghella V; Odibo AO; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):181-9. PubMed ID: 15994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms?
    Berghella V; Haas S; Chervoneva I; Hyslop T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 187(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 12237658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies.
    To MS; Palaniappan V; Skentou C; Gibb D; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 19(5):475-7. PubMed ID: 11982981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth.
    Simcox R; Shennan A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):831-42. PubMed ID: 17493875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.