These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11349316)

  • 1. [Using robots in hip prosthesis implantation. Precision with the wrong concept?].
    Burgkart R; Mittelmeier W; Steinhauser E; Gradinger R
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Apr; 143(15):36-7. PubMed ID: 11349316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
    Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The primary stability between manual and robot assisted implantation of hip prostheses: A biomechanical study on synthetic femurs].
    Decking J; Gerber A; Kränzlein J; Meurer A; Böhm B; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15250003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Primary rotatory stability of hip endoprostheses stems after manual and robot assisted implantation].
    Prymka M; Vogiatzis M; Hassenpflug J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
    Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
    Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL; Lee MS; Chen WP; Hsieh PH; Lee PC; Shih CH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.
    Speirs AD; Heller MO; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Perka C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 17275151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer-assisted, robot-assisted hip prosthesis--standard procedure or specialty indication?].
    Geiger C; Ostermann PA; Ekkernkamp A
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Apr; 95(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 11398618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses.
    Goetzen N; Lampe F; Nassut R; Morlock MM
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 15652559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of total hip replacement using the Robodoc surgical assistant system: clinical outcome and evaluation of complications for 97 procedures.
    Schulz AP; Seide K; Queitsch C; von Haugwitz A; Meiners J; Kienast B; Tarabolsi M; Kammal M; Jürgens C
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 18000945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Computer-assisted surgery for hip endoprosthesis].
    Börner M; Lahmer A; Wiesel U
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Jun; 93(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 10432568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision surgery.
    Dorr LD; Deshmane P
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.