These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11349316)

  • 21. Irregular rotation and shift of computer-assisted femoral stem implantation in THA--an experimental study.
    Pellengahr C; Huber A; Maier M; Müller PE; Zysk S; Troullier H; Dürr HR; Lienemann A; Jansson V; Refior HJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):60-3. PubMed ID: 12679874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of total hip arthroplasty on the structural and biomechanical properties of adult bone.
    Peck JJ; Stout SD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Feb; 138(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 18773467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison between hand rasping and robotic milling for stem implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Nishihara S; Sugano N; Nishii T; Miki H; Nakamura N; Yoshikawa H
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):957-66. PubMed ID: 17027537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
    Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Surgical robot in endoprosthetics. How CASPAR assists on the hip] the hip].
    Paul A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 1999 Aug; 141(33):18. PubMed ID: 10766540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prospective evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, anatomically designed, porous-coated femoral implant: mean 11-year follow-up.
    Butler JB; Lansky D; Duwelius PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Sep; 20(6):709-16. PubMed ID: 16139706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty using navigational tools.
    DiGioia AM; Blendea S; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():157-64. PubMed ID: 15116610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
    Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF; Habermann B; Mastrodomenico N; Kurth A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery.
    Renkawitz T; Tingart M; Grifka J; Sendtner E; Kalteis T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19751123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Histological and biomechanical study of impacted cancellous allografts with cement in the femur: a canine model.
    Omoto O; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Deie M; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1357-64. PubMed ID: 18758792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Computer-assisted robotics in hip endoprosthesis implantation].
    Börner M; Bauer A; Lahmer A
    Unfallchirurg; 1997 Aug; 100(8):640-5. PubMed ID: 9381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Robotics-assisted implantation of femoral components in hip endoprosthetics--an experimental study].
    Jerosch J; Finken N; Filler T; Peuker E; Rahgozar M; Lahmer A; Witzel U
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(4):Oa7-12. PubMed ID: 11051009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A finite element analysis of the vibrational behaviour of the intra-operatively manufactured prosthesis-femur system.
    Pastrav LC; Devos J; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 19136292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of optimal non-invasive patient fixation methods for use in robotic hip replacement surgery--an in vitro study.
    Schulz AP; Tarabolsi M; Faber A; Meiners J; Kammal M; Mantwill F
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17619243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.