115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11350026)
1. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol.
Smets EM; Péquériaux NC; Blaton V; Goldschmidt HM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 39(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 11350026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Multicenter evaluation on different analyzers of three methods for direct HDL-cholesterol assay].
Egloff M; Léglise D; Duvillard L; Steinmetz J; Boyer MJ; Ruelland A; Agher R; Beucler I
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1999; 57(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 10518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1).
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Tzallas C; Karabina SA; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 11849617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of a direct, immunoseparation based LDL-cholesterol method compared to Friedewald calculation and a polyvinyl sulphate precipitation method.
Cobbaert C; Broodman I; Swart GR; Hoogerbrugge N
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Jul; 33(7):417-24. PubMed ID: 7548448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Multicenter evaluation of four homogenous LDL-cholesterol assays].
Bayer P; Veinberg F; Couderc R; Cherfils C; Cambillau M; Cosson C; Fradin S; Gillery P; Steinmetz J; Legrand A; Egloff M; Beucler I
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 15689310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.
Anwar M; Khan DA; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jan; 24(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24411534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical performance and clinical efficacy of three routine procedures for LDL cholesterol measurement compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg(2+) method.
Nauck M; Rifai N
Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Apr; 294(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 10727675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of LDL cholesterol based on the Friedewald formula and on apo B levels.
Bairaktari E; Hatzidimou K; Tzallas C; Vini M; Katsaraki A; Tselepis A; Elisaf M; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2000 Oct; 33(7):549-55. PubMed ID: 11124340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the determination of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald accurate in CAPD and HD patients?
Nauck M; Krämer-Guth A; Bartens W; März W; Wieland H; Wanner C
Clin Nephrol; 1996 Nov; 46(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 8953121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population.
Tremblay AJ; Morrissette H; Gagné JM; Bergeron J; Gagné C; Couture P
Clin Biochem; 2004 Sep; 37(9):785-90. PubMed ID: 15329317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analytical and clinical performance of a detergent-based homogeneous LDL-cholesterol assay: a multicenter evaluation.
Nauck M; Graziani MS; Bruton D; Cobbaert C; Cole TG; Lefevre F; Riesen W; Bachorik PS; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 2000 Apr; 46(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 10759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of the precision of the Friedewald's formula for the calculation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in serum].
Chotkowska E; Kurjata P; Kupść W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2001 Oct; 11(64):348-51. PubMed ID: 11770317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytical and clinical performance of two homogeneous assays for measuring of LDL-cholesterol.
Leowattana W; Narkrung S; Pokum S; Kiartivich S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Nov; 83 Suppl 2():S6-12. PubMed ID: 11194023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the reliability of the Friedewald formula in the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.
Tremblay AJ; Bergeron J; Gagné JM; Gagné C; Couture P
Metabolism; 2005 Aug; 54(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16092050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analytical and clinical evaluation of two homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol in hyperlipidemic patients.
Esteban-Salán M; Guimón-Bardesi A; de La Viuda-Unzueta JM; Azcarate-Ania MN; Pascual-Usandizaga P; Amoroto-Del-Río E
Clin Chem; 2000 Aug; 46(8 Pt 1):1121-31. PubMed ID: 10926892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.
Scharnagl H; Nauck M; Wieland H; März W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 May; 39(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 11434393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 2 homogeneous high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays.
Hoang MP; Hirany SV; Parupia J; Devaraj S; Jialal I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):1005-9. PubMed ID: 9822130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholesterol Plus assay: comparison with beta-quantification and Friedewald formula.
Esteban-Salan M; Aguilar-Doreste JA; Arranz-Pena ML; Juve-Cuxart S; Gich-Salarich I; Zapico-Muniz E; Ordonez-Llanos J
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18722364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of alternative calculation methods for determining LDL cholesterol.
Vohnout B; Vachulová A; Blazícek P; Dukát A; Fodor G; Lietava J
Vnitr Lek; 2008 Oct; 54(10):961-4. PubMed ID: 19009762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
