198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11350200)
1. Evaluating the safety of microbial enzyme preparations used in food processing: update for a new century.
Pariza MW; Johnson EA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Apr; 33(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 11350200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining the safety of enzymes used in animal feed.
Pariza MW; Cook M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Apr; 56(3):332-42. PubMed ID: 19879914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Food-processing enzymes from recombinant microorganisms--a review.
Olempska-Beer ZS; Merker RI; Ditto MD; DiNovi MJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jul; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 16769167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information systems in food safety management.
McMeekin TA; Baranyi J; Bowman J; Dalgaard P; Kirk M; Ross T; Schmid S; Zwietering MH
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 112(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 16934895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory action criteria for filth and other extraneous materials v. strategy for evaluating hazardous and nonhazardous filth.
Olsen AR; Gecan JS; Ziobro GC; Bryce JR
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Jun; 33(3):363-92. PubMed ID: 11407939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Food safety in the 21st century.
Käferstein F; Abdussalam M
Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 10327714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Microbial Assessment Scheme to measure microbial performance of Food Safety Management Systems.
Jacxsens L; Kussaga J; Luning PA; Van der Spiegel M; Devlieghere F; Uyttendaele M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 134(1-2):113-25. PubMed ID: 19327860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation.
Gálvez A; Abriouel H; López RL; Ben Omar N
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 120(1-2):51-70. PubMed ID: 17614151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current codex guidelines for assessment of potential protein allergenicity.
Ladics GS
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S20-3. PubMed ID: 18708115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and traceability of genetically modified organisms in the food production chain.
Miraglia M; Berdal KG; Brera C; Corbisier P; Holst-Jensen A; Kok EJ; Marvin HJ; Schimmel H; Rentsch J; van Rie JP; Zagon J
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1157-80. PubMed ID: 15123385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Production of toxic metabolites in Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei: justification of mycotoxin testing in food grade enzyme preparations derived from the three fungi.
Blumenthal CZ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Apr; 39(2):214-28. PubMed ID: 15041150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk assessment strategies for Europe: integrated safety strategy or final product control: Example of Listeria monocytogenes in processed products from pork meat industry.
Salvat G; Fravalo P
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 Aug; 111(8):331-4. PubMed ID: 15469063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing risks.
Kasamatsu T; Kohda K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Oct; 46(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 16843577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Organization of risk analysis in the EU and the new EU food regulation.
Pina MC; Ferrer C; Rodrigo M; Klein G; Martínez A
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Nov; 113(11):407-12. PubMed ID: 17147150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention and control of food safety risks: the role of governments, food producers, marketers, and academia.
Lupien JR
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():74-9. PubMed ID: 17392080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward improving food safety in the domestic environment: a multi-item Rasch scale for the measurement of the safety efficacy of domestic food-handling practices.
Fischer AR; Frewer LJ; Nauta MJ
Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1323-38. PubMed ID: 17054534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the potential allergenicity of the enzyme microbial transglutaminase using the 2001 FAO/WHO Decision Tree.
Pedersen MH; Hansen TK; Sten E; Seguro K; Ohtsuka T; Morita A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Poulsen LK
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2004 Nov; 48(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 15508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
