These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11351736)

  • 1. Statistical assessment of violations of water quality standards under Section 303(d) of the clean water act.
    Smith EP; Ye K; Hughes C; Shabman L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Feb; 35(3):606-12. PubMed ID: 11351736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of chronic aquatic water quality criteria and standards for silver.
    Ford L
    Water Environ Res; 2001; 73(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 11563386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: a probabilistic approach for TMDL development.
    Borsuk ME; Stow CA; Reckhow KH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(10):2109-15. PubMed ID: 12038818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do reports on drinking water quality affect customers' concerns? Experiments in report content.
    Johnson BB
    Risk Anal; 2003 Oct; 23(5):985-98. PubMed ID: 12969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invertebrate-Based Water Quality Impairments and Associated Stressors Identified through the US Clean Water Act.
    Govenor H; Krometis LAH; Hession WC
    Environ Manage; 2017 Oct; 60(4):598-614. PubMed ID: 28667407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating sentinel watershed-systems into the monitoring and assessment of Minnesota's (USA) waters quality.
    Magner JA; Brooks KN
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Mar; 138(1-3):149-58. PubMed ID: 17505901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Oregon's beach sites for application to United States Environmental Protection Agency's BEACH Act criteria.
    Benedict RT; Neumann CM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2004 Oct; 49(7-8):630-6. PubMed ID: 15476842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Have U.S. surface waters responded to the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments?
    Kahl JS; Stoddard JL; Haeuber R; Paulsen SG; Birnbaum R; Deviney FA; Webb JR; DeWalle DR; Sharpe W; Driscoll CT; Herlihy AT; Kellogg JH; Murdoch PS; Roy K; Webster KE; Urquhart NS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(24):484A-490A. PubMed ID: 15669297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing water clarity as a component of water quality in Gulf of Mexico estuaries.
    Smith LM; Engle VD; Summers JK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Apr; 115(1-3):291-305. PubMed ID: 16614784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping U.S. water programs in check.
    Erickson B
    Anal Chem; 1998 Apr; 70(7):265A-268A. PubMed ID: 9553487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How probability survey data can help integrate 305(b) and 303(d) monitoring and assessment of state waters.
    Brown BS; Detenbeck NE; Eskin R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Apr; 103(1-3):41-57. PubMed ID: 15861986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effluent standards for developing countries: combining the technology- and water quality-based approach.
    Ragas AM; Scheren PA; Konterman HI; Leuven RS; Vugteveen P; Lubberding HJ; Niebeek G; Stortelder PB
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):133-44. PubMed ID: 16445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential Implications of Approaches to Climate Change on the Clean Water Rule Definition of "Waters of the United States".
    Faust DR; Moore MT; Emison GA; Rush SA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 May; 96(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 26979963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the US Clean Water Act 303(d) listing process for determining impairment of a waterbody.
    Keller AA; Cavallaro L
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Mar; 86(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 17270339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Water, water, everywhere.
    Sikora VA
    J Environ Health; 2002 May; 64(9):37-8. PubMed ID: 12004587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test of significant toxicity: a statistical application for assessing whether an effluent or site water is truly toxic.
    Denton DL; Diamond J; Zheng L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 May; 30(5):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21305584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A hierarchical modeling approach for estimating national distributions of chemicals in public drinking water systems.
    Qian SS; Schulman A; Koplos J; Kotros A; Kellar P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Feb; 38(4):1176-82. PubMed ID: 14998034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.