These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1135267)

  • 1. Letter: Weight-bearing orthoses.
    Warren CG
    Phys Ther; 1975 Jul; 55(7):793. PubMed ID: 1135267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions improve gait regularity in patients with peripheral neuropathy while walking on an irregular surface under low light.
    Richardson JK; Thies SB; DeMott TK; Ashton-Miller JA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Apr; 52(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 15066064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TL-61 versus Rohadur orthoses in heel spur syndrome.
    Ferguson H; Raskowsky M; Blake RL; Denton JA
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1991 Aug; 81(8):439-42. PubMed ID: 1920106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthotic fitting improves gait in a patient with generalized secondary dystonia.
    Mirlicourtois S; Bensoussan L; Viton JM; Collado H; Witjas T; Delarque A
    J Rehabil Med; 2009 May; 41(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 19479164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthotic effect on metatarsophalangeal joint extension. A preliminary study.
    Kilmartin TE; Wallace WA; Hill TW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1991 Aug; 81(8):414-7. PubMed ID: 1920102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of training on the use of weight-bearing orthoses.
    Warren GC; Lehmann JF
    Phys Ther; 1975 May; 55(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 1167233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do orthotic walkers affect knee and hip function during gait?
    Richards J; Payne K; Myatt D; Chohan A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 25239143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ischial and patellar-tendon weight-bearing braces: function, design, adjustment, and training.
    Lehmann JF; Warren CG
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1973; 10(19):6-19. PubMed ID: 4767331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance specification for lower limb orthotic devices.
    Johnson GR; Ferrarin M; Harrington M; Hermens H; Jonkers I; Mak P; Stallard J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Aug; 19(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 15288457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clash between theory and science on the kinematic effectiveness of foot orthoses.
    Payne C; Chuter V
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 2001 Oct; 18(4):705-13, vi. PubMed ID: 11699109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthotic management of cerebral palsy: recommendations from a consensus conference.
    Morris C; Bowers R; Ross K; Stevens P; Phillips D
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2011; 28(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 21335676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthotic options.
    Aiello DD; George P
    Rehab Manag; 2003 Mar; 16(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 12741243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthoses and ambulation in hemiplegia: a ten year retrospective study.
    Ofir R; Sell H
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 May; 61(5):216-20. PubMed ID: 7377942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses.
    Winchester PK; Carollo JJ; Parekh RN; Lutz LM; Aston JW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8233765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An overhead harness and trolly system for balance and ambulation assessment and training.
    Harburn KL; Hill KM; Kramer JF; Noh S; Vandervoort AA; Matheson JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Feb; 74(2):220-3. PubMed ID: 8431110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high- and low-arched individuals during walking.
    Zifchock RA; Davis I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18757124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthotic devices and gait in polio patients.
    Genêt F; Schnitzler A; Mathieu S; Autret K; Théfenne L; Dizien O; Maldjian A
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Feb; 53(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 20022835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of dynamic ankle-foot orthoses on functional ambulation activities, weight bearing and spatio-temporal characteristics of hemiparetic gait.
    Suat E; Fatma U; Nilgün B
    Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(25-26):2605-11. PubMed ID: 21682660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stiffness control in posterior-type plastic ankle-foot orthoses: effect of ankle trimline. Part 1: A device for measuring ankle moment.
    Sumiya T; Suzuki Y; Kasahara T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1996 Aug; 20(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 8876007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current status of orthotic management of children with meningomyelocele].
    Doll B; Michael T
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1994; 132(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.