These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11353429)

  • 1. Relation of electromyography-induced pain to type of recording electrodes.
    Walker WC; Keyser-Marcus LA; Johns JS; Seel RT
    Muscle Nerve; 2001 Mar; 24(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 11353429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of recording characteristics of monopolar and concentric needle electrodes.
    Kohara N; Kaji R; Kimura J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Aug; 89(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 7688687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Tedman B; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Oct; 13(10):909-14. PubMed ID: 2233847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in pain perception in women using concentric and monopolar needles.
    Balbierz JM; Petajan JH; Alder SC; Vlach SA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1403-6. PubMed ID: 17023253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of pain in needle electromyography.
    Strommen JA; Daube JR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Aug; 112(8):1414-8. PubMed ID: 11459681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain.
    El-Salem K; Shakhatreh M
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Aug; 38(2):1016-20. PubMed ID: 18663736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pain perception to nerve conduction and needle electromyographic procedures.
    Wee AS; Boyne RL; Abernathy SD; Nick TG
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2004 Nov; 45(11):327-30. PubMed ID: 15624629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of motor unit action potentials using monopolar vs. concentric needle electrodes in the middle deltoid and abductor digiti minimi muscles.
    Nelson RM; Shedlock M; Kaczmarek C; Gahrs J; MacLaughlin H
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 43(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 14717026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of pain during electromyography in children: A prospective study.
    Alshaikh NM; Martinez JP; Pitt MC
    Muscle Nerve; 2016 Sep; 54(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 26852012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The selection of electromyographic needle electrodes.
    Joynt RL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Mar; 75(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 8129574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysis.
    Howard JE; McGill KC; Dorfman LJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Oct; 11(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 3185599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information effect on the perception of pain during electromyography.
    Richardson JK; Evans JE; Warner JH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jun; 75(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 8002767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-fiber EMG with a concentric needle electrode: validation in myasthenia gravis.
    Sarrigiannis PG; Kennett RP; Read S; Farrugia ME
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Jan; 33(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 16175626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EMG needle causes severer pain in the end-plate region compared to the silent site of the muscle.
    Sener HO; Gökdemir O; Mutluer N
    Eur Neurol; 2000; 44(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 11096221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multifrequency characteristics of disposable and nondisposable EMG needle electrodes.
    Ackmann JJ; Lomas JN; Hoffmann RG; Wertsch JJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1993 Jun; 16(6):616-23. PubMed ID: 8502259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concentric needle electrodes are superior to perineal surface-patch electrodes for electromyographic documentation of urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding.
    Mahajan ST; Fitzgerald MP; Kenton K; Shott S; Brubaker L
    BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 16336340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recording characteristics of electrical impedance-electromyography needle electrodes.
    Kwon H; Di Cristina JF; Rutkove SB; Sanchez B
    Physiol Meas; 2018 May; 39(5):055005. PubMed ID: 29616985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between disposable and reusable single fiber needle electrodes in relation to stimulated single fiber studies.
    Papathanasiou ES; Zamba-Papanicolaou E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 123(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 22119663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is paradoxical sphincter reaction provoked by needle electrode electromyography?
    Johansson C; Nilsson BY; Holmström B; Dolk A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1991 Dec; 34(12):1109-12. PubMed ID: 1959460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.