These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1135348)

  • 21. Intact electrodermal skin conductance responses after bilateral amygdala damage.
    Tranel D; Damasio H
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 2733815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory event-related potentials and electrodermal activity in medicated and unmedicated schizophrenics.
    Roth WT; Goodale J; Pfefferbaum A
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Mar; 29(6):585-99. PubMed ID: 1675890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Significance and Novelty effects in single-trial ERP components and autonomic responses.
    MacDonald B; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():48-64. PubMed ID: 28389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrodermal responses to sources of dual-task interference.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F; Brooks RD; Festini SB; Frazier K
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):543-56. PubMed ID: 22552962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anxiety and the habituation of the skin conductance response.
    Watts JM
    Psychophysiology; 1975 Sep; 12(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 1181612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phasic electrodermal responses after visual stimulation in the cortically blind hemifield.
    Zihl J; Tretter F; Singer W
    Behav Brain Res; 1980 Apr; 1(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 7284086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Event-related potential correlates of phasic and tonic measures of the orienting reflex.
    Rushby JA; Barry RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Jul; 75(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 17462811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The object of perception and interference resistance in the auditory system].
    Lytaev SA; Shostak VI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1991; 17(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 1860582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reactivity to heteromodal stimulation as a function of stimulus intensity and inner arousal.
    Alexander R; Epstein S
    Psychophysiology; 1978 Sep; 15(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 693750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials.
    Roth WT; Ford JM; Stephen JL; Kopell BS
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Jul; 13(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 951472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task complexity, electrodermal activity and reaction time.
    Kleinman KM; Stern JA
    Psychophysiology; 1968 Jul; 5(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 5663772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phasic electrodermal orienting response in chronic schizophrenics. II. Response to auditory signals of varying intensity.
    Bernstein AS
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1970 Apr; 75(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 5422509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction between impulses evoked by stimuli of different modalities in neurons of the parietal associative cortex.
    Kazakov VN; Evtushenko SY
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1977; 8(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 617216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrodermal recovery rate in a schizophrenic population.
    Maricq HR; Edelberg R
    Psychophysiology; 1975 Nov; 12(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 1187965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relationship between autonomic variables and P300 in a habituation paradigm.
    Roth WT; Blowers GH; Kopell BS
    Prog Brain Res; 1980; 54():422-6. PubMed ID: 7220945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of intertrial intervals on recovery and amplitude of electrodermal reactions.
    Breault C; Ducharme R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1993 Jan; 14(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8432681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noradrenergic and cholinergic effects on speed and sensitivity measures of phasic alerting.
    Brown SB; Tona KD; van Noorden MS; Giltay EJ; van der Wee NJ; Nieuwenhuis S
    Behav Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 129(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 25621791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diurnal variations of tonic electrodermal activity.
    Hot P; Naveteur J; Leconte P; Sequeira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Sep; 33(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 10533838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Personality and electrodermal response lability: an interpretation.
    Crider A
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2008 Sep; 33(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 18509756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.