These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11354768)

  • 1. Current iodinated contrast media.
    Stacul F
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 11354768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current Radiographic Iodinated Contrast Agents.
    Spampinato MV; Abid A; Matheus MG
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2017 Nov; 25(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 28964459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Selection of contrast media: current status of understanding].
    Briguori C
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2009 Feb; 10(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 19348144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF
    Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents.
    Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urine profiles and kidney histology after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic radiologic and magnetic resonance contrast media in normal rats.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Larsen S; Horn T; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P; Golman K; Svendsen O
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Oct; 1(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 9419476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iodinated radiographic contrast media: comparison of low-osmolar with conventional ionic agents [corrected].
    Rubin JD; Cohan RH
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 3(5):637-45. PubMed ID: 1931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure-function relationships of iodinated contrast media and risk of nephrotoxicity.
    Stratta P; Quaglia M; Airoldi A; Aime S
    Curr Med Chem; 2012; 19(5):736-43. PubMed ID: 22204333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The osmolality of nonionic, iodinated contrast agents as an important factor for renal safety.
    Lenhard DC; Pietsch H; Sieber MA; Ernst R; Lengsfeld P; Ellinghaus P; Jost G
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):503-10. PubMed ID: 22864374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytotoxic effects of ionic high-osmolar, nonionic monomeric, and nonionic iso-osmolar dimeric iodinated contrast media on renal tubular cells in vitro.
    Heinrich MC; Kuhlmann MK; Grgic A; Heckmann M; Kramann B; Uder M
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):843-9. PubMed ID: 15845795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic iodinated low-osmolar contrast media on platelet function with the PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer).
    D'Anglemont De Tassigny A; IDéE JM; Corot AC
    Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):276-82. PubMed ID: 11323515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haemodynamic and rheological effects of contrast media: the role of viscosity and osmolality.
    Pugh ND
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6 Suppl 2():S13-5. PubMed ID: 8798050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physicochemical parameters of x-ray contrast media.
    Krause W; Miklautz H; Kollenkirchen U; Heimann G
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 8144342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP; Thrall JH; Shetty PC
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safer contrast agents?
    Dawson P; Allison DJ
    Br J Hosp Med; 1989 Nov; 42(5):406-7. PubMed ID: 2597825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ionic versus nonionic contrast use.
    Stolberg HO; McClennan BL
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1991; 20(2):47-88. PubMed ID: 2049958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New non-ionic contrast: effects on the cardiovascular system.
    Pagny JY; Gaux JC
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 9056156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preston M. Hickey memorial lecture. Ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: evolution and strategies for use.
    McClennan BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Aug; 155(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 2115244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.