These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11355100)

  • 1. Treatment and standard evaluation using the Peer Assessment Rating Index.
    Willems G; Heidbüchel R; Verdonck A; Carels C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories.
    Campbell CL; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Qi R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):822-9. PubMed ID: 18068603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthodontic treatment--improvement and standards using the peer assessment rating index.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 16539550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation into the standard of orthodontic treatment carried out by GDPs after completion of a clinical assistant training.
    Power SM; Hodgkins JF; Stephens CD; Webb WG
    Br Dent J; 1996 Feb; 180(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 8746141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.
    Birkeland K; Furevik J; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 9239958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic.
    Vu CQ; Roberts WE; Hartsfield JK; Ofner S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e1-13. PubMed ID: 18174061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the PAR index in assessing the effectiveness of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Kerr WJ; Buchanan IB; McColl JH
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Nov; 20(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 8286305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postgraduate teaching environment.
    McGuinness NJ; McDonald JP
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9633169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.
    Firestone AR; Häsler RU; Ingervall B
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10022180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.
    Teh LH; Kerr WJ; McColl JH
    J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 10867074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index.
    Chalabi O; Preston CB; Al-Jewair TS; Tabbaa S
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 26999888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standards of orthodontic treatment in cases treated by undergraduate students at Bristol Dental Hospital from 1982 to 1992.
    Tolidis K; Sandy JR
    Br Dent J; 1994 Sep; 177(6):203-7. PubMed ID: 7917615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.
    de Freitas KM; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Henriques JF; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e9-14. PubMed ID: 17920494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic treatment outcome in a First Nations population in Alberta, Canada: a comparative study.
    Cadman KC; Glover KE; Heo G; Warren S; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 11997764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The PAR index for evaluation of treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a clinical audit of 50 cases.
    Fadiga MS; Diouf JS; Diop Ba K; Gueye I; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):84-99. PubMed ID: 24529763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occlusal outcome of orthodontic treatment.
    al Yami EA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 9770102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
    DeGuzman L; Bahiraei D; Vig KW; Vig PS; Weyant RJ; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7847276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of orthodontic treatment using occlusal indices.
    Chew MT; Sandham A
    Singapore Dent J; 2001 Jun; 24(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11699355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.