These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11356209)

  • 1. Particle size analysis of amalgam powder and handpiece generated specimens.
    Drummond JL; Hathorn RM; Cailas MD; Karuhn R
    Dent Mater; 2001 Jul; 17(4):322-32. PubMed ID: 11356209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Particle versus mercury removal efficiency of amalgam separators.
    Drummond JL; Liu Y; Wu TY; Cailas MD
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 12615020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An estimation of the size distribution of amalgam particles in dental treatment waste.
    Letzel H; de Boer FA; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 1997 Mar; 76(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 9109828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
    Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating amalgam separators using an international standard.
    Batchu H; Rakowski D; Fan PL; Meyer DM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Jul; 137(7):999-1005. PubMed ID: 16803827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ablative potential of the erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser and conventional handpieces: a comparative study.
    Baraba A; Miletic I; Krmek SJ; Perhavec T; Bozic Z; Anic I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2009 Dec; 27(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 19731997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators.
    Fan PL; Batchu H; Chou HN; Gasparac W; Sandrik J; Meyer DM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 May; 133(5):577-84; quiz 623-5. PubMed ID: 12036162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The weight of wastes generated by removal of dental amalgam restorations and the concentration of mercury in dental wastewater.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA; Lugowski SJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 68(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 12366886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observation of an amalgam-bonded tooth through a scanning electron microscope.
    Orosa JL
    N Y State Dent J; 2003; 69(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 13677864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 10856807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental evaluation of precision laser cutting of dental hard tissues and materials.
    Cox CJ; Patel BC; Pearson GJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 8268843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The morphological characterization of dental amalgam alloy powders.
    Davies EH; Kuhn AT
    Biomaterials; 1984 Nov; 5(6):314-8. PubMed ID: 6525390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the long-term corrosion behavior of dental amalgams: influence of palladium addition and particle morphology.
    Colon P; Pradelle-Plasse N; Galland J
    Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 12628436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of amalgam separators].
    Surmont P; Enödy E
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(4):17-26. PubMed ID: 8090958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces.
    Choi C; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 20141814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
    Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.