These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

956 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11357569)

  • 21. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded amalgam and full crowns.
    Barkhordar RA; Plesh O; Curtis DA; Watanabe L; Parisi RG
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 10687470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
    Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
    Trope M; Tronstad L
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars.
    Soares CJ; Roscoe MG; Castro CG; Santana FR; Raposo LH; Quagliatto PS; Novais VR
    Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 21740445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of a self-adhesive resin luting system on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns.
    Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Abbas G; Richter B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Dec; 14(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17205955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
    Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.
    Fennis WM; Tezvergil A; Kuijs RH; Lassila LV; Kreulen CM; Creugers NH; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jun; 21(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 15904700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of glass-fiber posts on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with varying substance loss: an in vitro study.
    Mangold JT; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 21640240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite.
    Hürmüzlü F; Kiremitçi A; Serper A; Altundaşar E; Siso SH
    J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):838-40. PubMed ID: 14686819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
    Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.