These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
956 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11357569)
41. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Debonding of adhesively restored deep Class II MOD restorations after functional loading. Ausiello P; Davidson CL; Cascone P; DeGee AJ; Rengo S Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 10477988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. Forberger N; Göhring TN J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A short-term clinical evaluation of a tricure glass-ionomer system as a transitional restoration and core buildup material. Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Crisp RJ; Wilson MA Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):405-11. PubMed ID: 10635276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin. Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. de Freitas CR; Miranda MI; de Andrade MF; Flores VH; Vaz LG; Guimarães C Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 12238690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations. Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam. el-Badrawy WA Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation. Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: the effect of increased tooth preparation. Burke FJ Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 9063222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques. Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Fokkinga WA; Le Bell AM; Kreulen CM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH Int Endod J; 2005 Apr; 38(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 15810973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. Varvara G; Perinetti G; Di Iorio D; Murmura G; Caputi S J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 18021825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations. Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of dentin bonding and ferrule preparation on the fracture strength of crowned teeth restored with dowels and amalgam cores. Aykent F; Kalkan M; Yucel MT; Ozyesil AG J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 16616127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with the bonded amalgam technique. Dias de Souza GM; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Paulillo LA Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 11551017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of differing resin luting systems on fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Burke FJ; Watts DC Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 9611471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]