238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11357572)
1. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different techniques.
Reis A; Francci C; Loguercio AD; Carrilho MR; Rodriques Filho LE
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 11357572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: fracture strength using different materials.
Reis A; Kraul A; Francci C; de Assis TG; Crivelli DD; Oda M; Loguercio AD
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 12413229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction.
Stellini E; Stomaci D; Stomaci M; Petrone N; Favero L
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Jun; 24(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18489478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide lining before bonding.
Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Andreasen JO
Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11764835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adhesive bonding of fractured anterior teeth: effect of wet technique and rewetting agent.
Farik B; Munksgaard EC; Suh BI; Andreasen JO; Kreiborg S
Am J Dent; 1998 Dec; 11(6):251-3. PubMed ID: 10477974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of fractured or sectioned fragments on the fracture strength of different reattachment techniques.
Loguercio AD; Mengarda J; Amaral R; Kraul A; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 15195730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
Bruschi-Alonso RC; Alonso RC; Correr GM; Alves MC; Lewgoy HR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L
Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation.
Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM
Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.
Dean JA; Bullard G; Long RW; Moore BK; McDonald SM
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2004; 83(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15266732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study.
Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S
Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
Kivanç BH; Görgül G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques.
Capp CI; Roda MI; Tamaki R; Castanho GM; Camargo MA; de Cara AA
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Feb; 25(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 19208019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-attachment of a fractured tooth: a case report.
Arhun N; Ungor M
Dent Traumatol; 2007 Oct; 23(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 17803492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
