These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11359064)

  • 1. Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.
    Purcell S; Cherny SS; Hewitt JK; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci: sib pairs or sibships?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 10782019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quantitative LOD score: test statistic and sample size for exclusion and linkage of quantitative traits in human sibships.
    Page GP; Amos CI; Boerwinkle E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Apr; 62(4):962-8. PubMed ID: 9529341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping a quantitative trait locus via the EM algorithm and Bayesian classification.
    Ghosh S; Majumder PP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Sep; 19(2):97-126. PubMed ID: 10962473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 11791211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Score test for mapping quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size when the dominance effect is not negligible.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):398-412. PubMed ID: 12432506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method revisited: a robust approach for model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in large sibships.
    Cobat A; Abel L; Alcaïs A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 21181896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits.
    Fulker DW; Cherny SS; Sham PC; Hewitt JK
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):259-67. PubMed ID: 9915965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data.
    Fan R; Jung J
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):166-87. PubMed ID: 15031619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of variance components and sibpair-based approaches to quantitative trait linkage analysis in unselected samples.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10030396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified revisited Haseman-Elston method to further improve power.
    Wang T; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2004; 57(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 15192283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence of three score tests for association mapping of quantitative trait loci under selective genotyping.
    Tang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 34(5):522-7. PubMed ID: 20552655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extreme selection strategies in gene mapping studies of oligogenic quantitative traits do not always increase power.
    Allison DB; Heo M; Schork NJ; Wong SL; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 1998; 48(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 9526169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multivariate model for the analysis of sibship covariance structure using marker information and multiple quantitative traits.
    Vogler GP; Tang W; Nelson TL; Hofer SM; Grant JD; Tarantino LM; Fernandez JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):921-6. PubMed ID: 9433601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble Learning of QTL Models Improves Prediction of Complex Traits.
    Bian Y; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Aug; 5(10):2073-84. PubMed ID: 26276383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power of selective genotyping in genetic association analyses of quantitative traits.
    Van Gestel S; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; Adolfsson R; van Duijn CM; Van Broeckhoven C
    Behav Genet; 2000 Mar; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 10979604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.