BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11359257)

  • 1. Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits.
    Jemt T; Lekholm U; Johansson CB
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 11359257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biologic response of immediately versus delayed loaded implants supporting ill-fitting prostheses: an animal study.
    Duyck J; Vrielinck L; Lambrichts I; Abe Y; Schepers S; Politis C; Naert I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 16219245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study.
    Hall J; Miranda-Burgos P; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S76-82. PubMed ID: 16137091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screw preloads and measurements of surface roughness in screw joints: an in vitro study on implant frameworks.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Wennerberg A; Berggren C; Brycke M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 16219244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits.
    Steigenga J; Al-Shammari K; Misch C; Nociti FH; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1233-41. PubMed ID: 15515339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.
    Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
    Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits.
    Jemt T; Lekholm U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Aug; 9(4):272-80. PubMed ID: 9760902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between implant/abutment vertical misfit and torque loss of abutment screws.
    Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; das Neves FD; Fernandes Neto AJ; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 19180328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant bone alterations under the influence of abutment screw preload stress. A preclinical vivo study.
    Al-Omari FA; Nagasawa M; Suliman M; Khraisat A; Uoshima K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1232-1242. PubMed ID: 32979889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits.
    Chowdhary R; Halldin A; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24034600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
    Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of self-cutting and nonself-cutting thread designed implant with different thread depth on variable insertion torques: An histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
    Muktadar AK; Gangaiah M; Chrcanovic BR; Chowdhary R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):507-514. PubMed ID: 29659124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits.
    Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cyclosporin a on mechanical retention of dental implants previously integrated to the bone: a study in rabbits.
    Sakakura CE; Margonar R; Sartori R; Morais JA; Marcantonio E
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2059-62. PubMed ID: 17209791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
    Duyck J; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study.
    Duyck J; Roesems R; Cardoso MV; Ogawa T; De Villa Camargos G; Vandamme K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 24325598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of two torque values on the screw preload of implant-supported prostheses with passive fit or misfit.
    Al-Otaibi HN; Akeel RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 25216130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type.
    Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.