These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11359259)

  • 1. Proposed method for the standardized measurement of marginal bone height on periapical radiographs with the Brånemark System.
    Galasso L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 11359259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardization of radiographs for mandibular implant-supported overdentures: review and innovation.
    Payne AG; Solomons YF; Lownie JF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1999 Aug; 10(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 10551073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized radiographs of the alveolar crest around implants in the mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 1501182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.
    Sundén S; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Dec; 6(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 8603113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A technique for standardized evaluation of soft and hard peri-implant tissues in partially edentulous patients.
    Meijndert L; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 15212345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal bone level changes and prosthetic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 2 implants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial.
    Cehreli MC; Uysal S; Akca K
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19220845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment.
    Wyatt CC; Pharoah MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):442-52. PubMed ID: 9922736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A radiograph positioning technique to evaluate prosthetic misfit and bone loss around implants.
    Lin KC; Wadhwani CP; Sharma A; Finzen F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 24238927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
    Pikner SS
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Turned Brånemark System implants in wide and narrow edentulous maxillae: a retrospective clinical study.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 18462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study.
    Brånemark PI; Engstrand P; Ohrnell LO; Gröndahl K; Nilsson P; Hagberg K; Darle C; Lekholm U
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 1999; 1(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 11359307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective analysis of bar-retained dentures with cantilever extension: marginal bone level changes around dental implants over time.
    Semper W; Heberer S; Nelson K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20369100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants.
    Cranin AN; DeGrado J; Kaufman M; Baraoidan M; DiGregorio R; Batgitis G; Lee Z
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9893520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
    Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Retrospective 2-Year Clinical Study of Immediate Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws with Four Implants and Prefabricated Bars.
    Sannino G; Bollero P; Barlattani A; Gherlone E
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):387-394. PubMed ID: 26619306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.